Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

INLAND NORTHWEST WILDLIFE COUNCIL

INLAND NORTHWEST WILDLIFE COUNCIL (Washington) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $32,500 to it, the largest being Innovia Foundation ($20,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 62% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$522k
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$33k
Net assets
$439k
0/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 15%
01What it does

What Inland Northwest Wildlife Council does

Mission

Promote interest, education, and conservation regarding hunting and fishing and aid in the protection of wildlife. Promote sportsman like hunting methods and improve hunter/landowner relations.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Promote conservation, interest, and education regarding hunting and aid in the protection of wildlife. Promote sportsman like hunting methods and improve hunter/landowner relations.

    $462,435 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $462,435.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($455k) Expenses 100 ($462k) Net assets 100 ($747k)2018 Revenue 100 ($454k) Expenses 102 ($473k) Net assets 98 ($728k)2019 Revenue 97 ($441k) Expenses 97 ($447k) Net assets 97 ($721k)2020 Revenue 82 ($372k) Expenses 78 ($362k) Net assets 98 ($732k)2021 Revenue 28 ($130k) Expenses 44 ($205k) Net assets 88 ($656k)2022 Revenue 74 ($338k) Expenses 95 ($439k) Net assets 74 ($555k)2023 Revenue 107 ($489k) Expenses 118 ($545k) Net assets 67 ($499k)2024 Revenue 99 ($449k) Expenses 100 ($463k) Net assets 65 ($485k)2025 Revenue 115 ($522k) Expenses 123 ($568k) Net assets 59 ($439k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (115)Expenses (123)Net assets (59)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $705k to $598k (−15%).

$773k
$742k
$740k
$765k
$705k
$598k
$542k
$489k
$456k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 25% · 2023 15% · 2024 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

1% of INLAND NORTHWEST WILDLIFE COUNCIL’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (86% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 7,042 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 8 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$7k
’17
−$18k
’18
−$7k
’19
$10k
’20
−$75k
’21
−$101k
’22
−$56k
’23
−$14k
’24
−$46k
’25
1.1
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2023 and FY2024 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed201616181719877
Joined·+4+6+2+3+4+1+3+1
No longer listed·860421241
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2021: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $13k → $20k.

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 62% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of INLAND NORTHWEST WILDLIFE COUNCIL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

INLAND NORTHWEST WILDLIFE COUNCIL leans on a few funders — its largest provides 62% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund INLAND NORTHWEST WILDLIFE COUNCIL.

62%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

62% of INLAND NORTHWEST WILDLIFE COUNCIL's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $13k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Washington, across 1 state.

NY

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $20k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

INLAND NORTHWEST WILDLIFE COUNCIL receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $33k to it.

Operating margin−9% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve1.1mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)2% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,693 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like INLAND NORTHWEST WILDLIFE COUNCIL

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

81% of spending goes to programs.

Program 81%Management 16%Fundraising 2%

Governance

7
board members
0%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

0%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for INLAND NORTHWEST WILDLIFE COUNCIL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds INLAND NORTHWEST WILDLIFE COUNCIL?
INLAND NORTHWEST WILDLIFE COUNCIL (Washington) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $32,500 to it, the largest being Innovia Foundation ($20,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 62% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does INLAND NORTHWEST WILDLIFE COUNCIL have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $32,500 in grants to INLAND NORTHWEST WILDLIFE COUNCIL.
Who is the largest funder of INLAND NORTHWEST WILDLIFE COUNCIL?
Innovia Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $20,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like INLAND NORTHWEST WILDLIFE COUNCIL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Inland Northwest Wildlife Council →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing