Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

Influence the Choice

Influence the Choice (Washington) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $16,000 to it, the largest being CREDIT UNIONS IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ($15,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$130k
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$16k
Net assets
$57k
0/2 repeat funders
01What it does

What Influence the Choice does

Mission

Primary Exempt Purpose Influence the Choice is committed to reducing youth substance use and promoting overall well-being by addressing root causes, fostering resilience, and providing education and prevention services to youth, families, and communities. Information/Education Services provide information to parents, caregivers and community members about youth substance use and ways to prevent it. For 2025, events and number served is as follows: Hidden in Plain Sight - 20, Action Forum for Youth - 35, Positive Community Norms Campaign - 100,000, Resource Fairs - 1,200 Youth Programs provide opportunities for students to advocate for youth substance use prevention, provide resilience skills and refusal skills and build leadership. For 2025, events and number served is as follows: TECH Youth Board - 12 students, Power of Me, Power of We Youth Conference - 45 students, Art with Influence Student Art Contest - 18, Youth Advocacy Day - 16 students.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Programs

  1. Information/Education Services - See Schedule O

    $35,443 spent
    50% of program spending
  2. Youth Programs - See Schedule O

    $35,455 spent
    50% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $70,898.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2023, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2023, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20232023 Revenue 100 ($95k) Expenses 100 ($55k) Net assets 100 ($87k)2024 Revenue 97 ($92k) Expenses 229 ($126k) Net assets 61 ($53k)2025 Revenue 136 ($130k) Expenses 229 ($126k) Net assets 66 ($57k)
202320242025
Revenue (136)Expenses (229)Net assets (66)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $92k to $55k (−40%).

$92k
$55k
$62k
202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of Influence the Choice’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (94% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,778 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.

$40k
’23
−$34k
’24
$4k
’25

Leadership and staff

Board chair

Brooke Drennon

Board Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

Funder
'22
'24*
total
funders
1
1

From the IRS filings of Influence the Choice’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Influence the Choice leans on a few funders — its largest provides 94% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

94% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Influence the Choice.

94%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

94% of Influence the Choice's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA
MO

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Influence the Choice has grown faster than half of the 1,547 crime & legal nonprofits its size.

Operating margin3% · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)17% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,547 crime & legal nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Government funding Influence the Choice receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $180k on record.

Federal$180k
grants $180kcontracts $0
24
25
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Health and Human Services$180k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Influence the Choice

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Influence the Choice: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Influence the Choice?
Influence the Choice (Washington) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $16,000 to it, the largest being CREDIT UNIONS IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ($15,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Influence the Choice have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $16,000 in grants to Influence the Choice.
Who is the largest funder of Influence the Choice?
CREDIT UNIONS IN THE STATE OF WASHINGTON is the largest funder on record, with $15,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Influence the Choice find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Influence the Choice →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2023–2025), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing