Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

IAS

IAS (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $60,000 to it, the largest being CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ($50,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$1.2M
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$60k
Net assets
$1.9M
0/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%
01What it does

What Ias does

Mission

To provide critical platforms for presenting new research, sharing best practices and advancing the fight against aids and promoting dialogue, education and networking to help close gaps in knowledge and expertise at every level of the response to aids.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. Ias 2025, the 13th international aids society conference on hiv science, took place in kigali, rwanda, and virtually from 13 to 17 july 2025. Despite challenges created by sudden funding cuts, almost 4,000 people came together in kigali and virtually, showing the resilience that defines the hiv response and a commitment to protecting gains made in over 40 years of this pandemic. Ias 2025 provided a forum for participants to review the early impact of us funding cuts and debate how the hiv response can adapt to shrinking donor support. Scientific innovation in prevention was also at the forefront during Ias 2025, with the release of new world health organization (who) guidelines recommending the use of long-acting injectable lenacapavir as a pre-exposure prophylaxis (prep) option and the presentation of promising data on the experimental monthly prep agent, mk-8527. Ias 2025 showcased the central role of african science in shaping the global hiv response. The conference also highlighted the host country's achievement in reaching the 95-95-95 targets for hiv diagnosis, treatment and viral suppression and its success in tackling a marburg virus outbreak in 2024. A total of 5,257…

    $940,000 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990. Program spending in total: $940,000.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($828k) Expenses 100 ($913k) Net assets 100 ($700k)2018 Revenue 189 ($1.6M) Expenses 154 ($1.4M) Net assets 122 ($857k)2019 Revenue 129 ($1.1M) Expenses 162 ($1.5M) Net assets 64 ($451k)2020 Revenue 1184 ($9.8M) Expenses 1048 ($9.6M) Net assets 99 ($691k)2021 Revenue 201 ($1.7M) Expenses 178 ($1.6M) Net assets 104 ($727k)2022 Revenue 159 ($1.3M) Expenses 114 ($1.0M) Net assets 144 ($1.0M)2023 Revenue 159 ($1.3M) Expenses 93 ($851k) Net assets 211 ($1.5M)2024 Revenue 337 ($2.8M) Expenses 264 ($2.4M) Net assets 265 ($1.9M)2025 Revenue 149 ($1.2M) Expenses 110 ($1.0M) Net assets 275 ($1.9M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (149)Expenses (110)Net assets (275)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $5.9M to $12M (+105%).

$3.9M
$5.4M
$5.9M
$12M
$12M
$13M
$11M
$11M
$8.3M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 85% · 2018 64% · 2019 70% · 2020 77% · 2021 86% · 2022 67% · 2023 57% · 2024 82% · 2025 76%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

79% of IAS’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (51% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 8,611 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$85k
’17
$157k
’18
−$406k
’19
$240k
’20
$35k
’21
$282k
’22
$467k
’23
$378k
’24
$228k
’25
99
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Birgit Poniatowski

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2020 and FY2021 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed446955566
Joined·+1+4+3+0+1+0+1+1
No longer listed·12041001
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2022: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $50k → $10k.

Funder
'20
'22
total
funders
1
1

2 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of IAS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

IAS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 83% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund IAS.

83%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2022 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of IAS's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $60k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

IAS runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 4,665 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin18% · top quartile
Months of reserve98.8mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)5% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,665 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like IAS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

93% of spending goes to programs.

Program 93%Management 7%Fundraising 0%

Governance

5
board members
60%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

81%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

DC

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • International AIDS Society · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for IAS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds IAS?
IAS (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $60,000 to it, the largest being CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ($50,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does IAS have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $60,000 in grants to IAS.
Who is the largest funder of IAS?
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA is the largest funder on record, with $50,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like IAS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing