Loading…
Loading…
Michigan · Nonprofit
HENRY FORD MACOMB HOSPITAL CORPORATION (Michigan) is funded by 8 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $477,364 in grants to it, the largest being MICHIGAN HEALTH & HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ($219,824). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
HENRY FORD MACOMB HOSPITAL CORPORATION is better cushioned than half of the 1,388 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,388 health nonprofits over $100M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
Government-grant reliance: 2024 1%. Grants only — government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
1% of HENRY FORD MACOMB HOSPITAL CORPORATION’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (1% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
Grant income rose $8k → $29k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
4 of 8 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 39% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of HENRY FORD MACOMB HOSPITAL CORPORATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
HENRY FORD MACOMB HOSPITAL CORPORATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 46% of grant income and the top three 83%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 74% · 2018 100% · 2019 46% · 2020 66% · 2021 79% · 2023 100% · 2024 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
0% of HENRY FORD MACOMB HOSPITAL CORPORATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
HENRY FORD MACOMB HOSPITAL CORPORATION is locally rooted: 57% of its grant income comes from Michigan funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 8 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
96% of spending goes to programs.
Part of a family of 45 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 8funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing