Arizona · Nonprofit
HARVEST ECO SALVAGE
HARVEST ECO SALVAGE (Arizona) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $52,381 to it, the largest being EPKER-SINHA FOUNDATION ($28,760). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
HARVEST ECO SALVAGE's revenue fell 96% between 2021 and 2024.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,184 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Richard Saltonstall Charitable Foundationshared funders
- Foundation for Sustainability and Innovationportfolio match
- The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
100% of HARVEST ECO SALVAGE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2020 → 2021: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $15k → $14k.
1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 45% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of HARVEST ECO SALVAGE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
HARVEST ECO SALVAGE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 55% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
45% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund HARVEST ECO SALVAGE.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
HARVEST ECO SALVAGE draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Arizona, across 1 state in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $24k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Richard Saltonstall Charitable Foundationshared fundersMA · backs 6 organizations that share your funders
- Foundation for Sustainability and Innovationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- New Earth Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Beacon Credit Union Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Blooming Prairie Fdn Inc Investment Agyportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Farver Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Lagrange County Community Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Dearborn Community Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Clif Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Alfred J McAllister and Dorothy N McAllister Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Baxley Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like HARVEST ECO SALVAGE
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Arizona
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
64% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for HARVEST ECO SALVAGE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds HARVEST ECO SALVAGE?
- HARVEST ECO SALVAGE (Arizona) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $52,381 to it, the largest being EPKER-SINHA FOUNDATION ($28,760). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does HARVEST ECO SALVAGE have?
- IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $52,381 in grants to HARVEST ECO SALVAGE, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of HARVEST ECO SALVAGE?
- EPKER-SINHA FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $28,760 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like HARVEST ECO SALVAGE find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Arizona. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2021–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing