Loading…
Loading…
Massachusetts · Nonprofit
HARVARD CLUB OF BOSTON FOUNDATION (Massachusetts) is funded by 3 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $1,830 in grants to it, the largest being The Devereaux Foundation ($1,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
HARVARD CLUB OF BOSTON FOUNDATION is better cushioned than half of the 20,012 education nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 20,012 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
0% of HARVARD CLUB OF BOSTON FOUNDATION’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (55% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
$80 from 1 funders in 2019, up from $1k and 3 in 2017.
From the IRS filings of HARVARD CLUB OF BOSTON FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
HARVARD CLUB OF BOSTON FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 55% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 73% · 2018 79% · 2019 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
HARVARD CLUB OF BOSTON FOUNDATION draws 55% of its grant income from funders outside Massachusetts — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 2 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing