Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Oklahoma · Nonprofit

GROUND WATER PROTECTION

GROUND WATER PROTECTION (Oklahoma) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $964,071 to it, the largest being AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE ($880,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$19M
Revenue FY2024
2
Funders on record
$964k
Grants received
$9.8M
Net assets
1/2 repeat funders

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($18M) Expenses 100 ($17M) Net assets 100 ($6.9M)2021 Revenue 75 ($13M) Expenses 75 ($13M) Net assets 107 ($7.3M)2022 Revenue 103 ($18M) Expenses 116 ($20M) Net assets 83 ($5.8M)2023 Revenue 139 ($25M) Expenses 115 ($20M) Net assets 163 ($11M)2024 Revenue 105 ($19M) Expenses 119 ($20M) Net assets 142 ($9.8M)
20202021202220232024
Revenue (105)Expenses (119)Net assets (142)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 97% · 2021 25% · 2022 32% · 2023 97% · 2024 23%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 5 reported years ran a deficit.

$690k
20
$444k
21
$1.6M
22
$5.1M
23
$1.6M
24
1.9
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2019: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $480k → $400k.

Funder
'17
'19
'25*
total
funders
1
1
1

From the IRS filings of GROUND WATER PROTECTION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

GROUND WATER PROTECTION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 91% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund GROUND WATER PROTECTION.

91%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2019 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

GROUND WATER PROTECTION draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Oklahoma, across 2 states in all.

PA
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
19
Oklahoma out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding GROUND WATER PROTECTION receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $38.6M on record — $38.5M federal, $71k state.

Federal$38.5M
grants $38.5Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top agencies
  • Department of Energy$34.6M
  • Environmental Protection Agency$3.9M
State$71k
08
12
19
24
25
26
By state
  • DE$66k
  • OK$4k
  • FL$525

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like GROUND WATER PROTECTION

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Oklahoma

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

95% of spending goes to programs.

Program 95%Management 5%Fundraising 0%

Governance

16
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for GROUND WATER PROTECTION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds GROUND WATER PROTECTION?
GROUND WATER PROTECTION (Oklahoma) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $964,071 to it, the largest being AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE ($880,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does GROUND WATER PROTECTION have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $964,071 in grants to GROUND WATER PROTECTION, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of GROUND WATER PROTECTION?
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE is the largest funder on record, with $880,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like GROUND WATER PROTECTION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oklahoma. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2020–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing