Loading…
Loading…
Michigan · Nonprofit
GRAND BLANC ATHLETIC FOUNDATION (Michigan) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $139,613 in grants to it, the largest being TOURNAMENTS FOR CHARITY ($120,463). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
GRAND BLANC ATHLETIC FOUNDATION runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 21,172 education nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 21,172 education nonprofits under $100k, FY2022
$14k from 1 funders in 2024, up from $19k and 1 in 2017.
From the IRS filings of GRAND BLANC ATHLETIC FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
GRAND BLANC ATHLETIC FOUNDATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 86% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2019 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% · 2024 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
GRAND BLANC ATHLETIC FOUNDATION draws 86% of its grant income from funders outside Michigan — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 2 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 2 funders put you under-funded among the 141 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
92% of spending goes to programs.
77%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2022 (financials across 2022–2022), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing