Loading…
Loading…
Florida · Nonprofit
GADSDEN COUNTY HEALTHY START (Florida) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $3,215,049 in grants to it, the largest being FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF HEALTHY START ($2,151,815). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
GADSDEN COUNTY HEALTHY START is better cushioned than half of the 13,210 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,210 health nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2023
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
100% of GADSDEN COUNTY HEALTHY START’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (78% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
$325k from 1 funders in 2025, up from $352k and 2 in 2018.
From the IRS filings of GADSDEN COUNTY HEALTHY START’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
GADSDEN COUNTY HEALTHY START leans on a few funders — its largest provides 67% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 59% · 2019 65% · 2020 64% · 2021 53% · 2022 63% · 2023 73% · 2024 67% · 2025 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
GADSDEN COUNTY HEALTHY START is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Florida funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 2 funders put you under-funded among the 60 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
87% of spending goes to programs.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2018–2023), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing