California · Nonprofit
FOUNDATION FOR CHIROPRACTIC PROGRES
FOUNDATION FOR CHIROPRACTIC PROGRES (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,187,870 to it, the largest being NATIONAL BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS ($703,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
FOUNDATION FOR CHIROPRACTIC PROGRES is better cushioned than half of the 3,968 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,968 health nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Gulf of Mexico Allianceshared funders
- American Physical Therapy Associationportfolio match
- Cerebral Palsy Alliance Research Foundationportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2021 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
100% of FOUNDATION FOR CHIROPRACTIC PROGRES’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (51% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 5 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $84k → $86k.
1 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of FOUNDATION FOR CHIROPRACTIC PROGRES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
FOUNDATION FOR CHIROPRACTIC PROGRES leans on a few funders — its largest provides 59% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund FOUNDATION FOR CHIROPRACTIC PROGRES.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 40% · 2018 44% · 2019 89% · 2020 43% · 2021 61% · 2022 61% · 2023 41% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
FOUNDATION FOR CHIROPRACTIC PROGRES draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 6 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $12k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Gulf of Mexico Allianceshared fundersMS · backs 2 organizations that share your funders
- American Physical Therapy Associationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Cerebral Palsy Alliance Research Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Numotion Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Permobil Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Libra Global Philanthropies Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Spinnaker Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- 4 Cornerstones Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Agarwal Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Morten Andersen Family Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Comcast Spectacor Charities Flyers Wives Fight For Livesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Integra Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like FOUNDATION FOR CHIROPRACTIC PROGRES
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
80% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Footprint & structure
Part of a family of 1 related entity
- Foundation for Chriopractic Educati · exempt
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for FOUNDATION FOR CHIROPRACTIC PROGRES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR CHIROPRACTIC PROGRES?
- FOUNDATION FOR CHIROPRACTIC PROGRES (California) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,187,870 to it, the largest being NATIONAL BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS ($703,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does FOUNDATION FOR CHIROPRACTIC PROGRES have?
- IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $1,187,870 in grants to FOUNDATION FOR CHIROPRACTIC PROGRES, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of FOUNDATION FOR CHIROPRACTIC PROGRES?
- NATIONAL BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS is the largest funder on record, with $703,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like FOUNDATION FOR CHIROPRACTIC PROGRES find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing