Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

North Carolina · Nonprofit

Elizabeth City Downtown Inc A Revitalization Corporation

Elizabeth City Downtown Inc A Revitalization Corporation (North Carolina) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $52,628 to it, the largest being SENTARA HEALTHCARE ($45,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$374k
Revenue FY2025
2
Funders on record
$53k
Grants received
$790k
Net assets
1/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%

Against its field

Elizabeth City Downtown Inc A Revitalization Corporation holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 10,664 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin7% · above the median
Months of reserve26.1mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)17% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 10,664 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($168k) Expenses 100 ($192k) Net assets 100 ($209k)2021 Revenue 161 ($270k) Expenses 36 ($70k) Net assets 195 ($409k)2022 Revenue 151 ($253k) Expenses 96 ($184k) Net assets 228 ($477k)2023 Revenue 93 ($156k) Expenses 47 ($90k) Net assets 260 ($543k)2024 Revenue 235 ($394k) Expenses 90 ($173k) Net assets 365 ($764k)2025 Revenue 223 ($374k) Expenses 181 ($348k) Net assets 378 ($790k)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (223)Expenses (181)Net assets (378)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 91% · 2021 24% · 2022 33% · 2023 52% · 2024 63% · 2025 80%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

80% of Elizabeth City Downtown Inc A Revitalization Corporation’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,459 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$24k
20
$199k
21
$69k
22
$66k
23
$221k
24
$26k
25
26
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $8k → $15k.

Funder
'20
'22
'23
'24*
total
Sentara Healthcareunclassified
$45k
$8k
funders
1
1
1
1

From the IRS filings of Elizabeth City Downtown Inc A Revitalization Corporation’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Elizabeth City Downtown Inc A Revitalization Corporation leans on a few funders — its largest provides 86% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Elizabeth City Downtown Inc A Revitalization Corporation.

86%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

Elizabeth City Downtown Inc A Revitalization Corporation draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside North Carolina, across 2 states in all.

NY
VA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

20
22
23
North Carolina out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like Elizabeth City Downtown Inc A Revitalization Corporation

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In North Carolina

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

94% of spending goes to programs.

Program 94%Management 6%Fundraising 0%

Governance

13
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

64%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Elizabeth City Downtown Inc A Revitalization Corporation: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Elizabeth City Downtown Inc A Revitalization Corporation?
Elizabeth City Downtown Inc A Revitalization Corporation (North Carolina) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $52,628 to it, the largest being SENTARA HEALTHCARE ($45,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Elizabeth City Downtown Inc A Revitalization Corporation have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $52,628 in grants to Elizabeth City Downtown Inc A Revitalization Corporation, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Elizabeth City Downtown Inc A Revitalization Corporation?
SENTARA HEALTHCARE is the largest funder on record, with $45,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Elizabeth City Downtown Inc A Revitalization Corporation find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in North Carolina. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing