Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Massachusetts · Nonprofit

Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc

Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc (Massachusetts) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $100,077 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($56,377). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 56% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$177k
Revenue FY2024
7
Funders on record
$100k
Grants received
$1.3M
Net assets
4/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 19%

Against its field

Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc has grown faster than half of the 17,904 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Months of reserve4.3mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)14% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 17,904 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($73k) Expenses 100 ($68k) Net assets 100 ($1.0M)2018 Revenue 178 ($129k) Expenses 155 ($105k) Net assets 91 ($939k)2019 Revenue 157 ($114k) Expenses 132 ($90k) Net assets 104 ($1.1M)2020 Revenue 189 ($137k) Expenses 103 ($70k) Net assets 113 ($1.2M)2021 Revenue 139 ($101k) Expenses 132 ($90k) Net assets 125 ($1.3M)2022 Revenue 147 ($107k) Expenses 141 ($96k) Net assets 110 ($1.1M)2023 Revenue 177 ($128k) Expenses 180 ($123k) Net assets 119 ($1.2M)2024 Revenue 244 ($177k) Expenses 203 ($138k) Net assets 130 ($1.3M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (244)Expenses (203)Net assets (130)Peer revenue range
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 4 funders, grant income rose $1k → $24k.

1 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)56% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 6 of 7 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc leans on a few funders — its largest provides 56% of grant income and the top three 79%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

56% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc.

56%
largest funder
79%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 50% · 2021 73% · 2022 67% · 2023 41%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

56% of Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $44k that is directly attributable, 74% of it comes from Massachusetts funders.

VT
MA
RI

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Massachusetts out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $56k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 7 funders put you under-funded among the 397 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government funding Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $11k on record.

State$11k
Top programs
  • (PP) STATE AID/POL SUB$11k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Massachusetts

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc?
Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc (Massachusetts) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $100,077 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($56,377). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 56% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $100,077 in grants to Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $56,377 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Cuttyhunk Historical Society Inc find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Massachusetts. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing