Loading…
Loading…
New York · Nonprofit
COURTS OF DREAMS INC (New York) is funded by 4 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $38,500 in grants to it, the largest being THE DAVID & SONDRA MACK FAMILY ($20,000). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
COURTS OF DREAMS INC holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 1,406 youth development nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,406 youth development nonprofits under $100k, FY2025
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
$1k from 1 funders in 2024, up from $19k and 3 in 2022.
From the IRS filings of COURTS OF DREAMS INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
COURTS OF DREAMS INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 52% of grant income and the top three 97%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2022 54% · 2023 53% · 2024 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
COURTS OF DREAMS INC draws 60% of its grant income from funders outside New York — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 3 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 4 funders put you under-funded among the 202 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing