Skip to content

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

Cotton Council International

Cotton Council International (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $145,000 to it, the largest being CALIFORNIA COTTON ALLIANCE ($115,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$30M
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$145k
Net assets
$2.2M
2/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What Cotton Council International does

Mission

To make U.S. cotton the preferred fiber for mills/manufacturers, brands/retailers and consumers, commanding a value-added premium that delivers profitability across the U.S. cotton industry and drives export growth of fiber, yarn and other cotton products.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Market Access Program (MAP):CCI uses Market Access Program (MAP) funding for overseas marketing and promotional activities that help build commercial export markets for U.S. cotton and cotton products. Activities include consumer advertising, public relations, point-of-sale demonstrations, participation in trade fairs and exhibits, and others.

  2. Foreign Market Development (FMD):CCI uses Foreign Market Development (FMD) Program funding to create, expandand maintainlong-term export markets for U.S. cotton. FMD-funded projects generally address long-term opportunities to reduce foreign import constraints or expand export growth opportunities.

  3. Agricultural Trade Promotion Program (ATP):CCI uses Agricultural Trade Promotion Program (ATP) funding for overseas marketing and promotional activities that help build commercial export markets for U.S. cotton and cotton products. Activities include consumer advertising, public relations, point-of-sale demonstrations, participation in trade fairs and exhibits, and others.

  4. Emerging Market Program (EMP):CCI conducts targeted technical assistance to promote the export of U.S. cotton via presentations that feature the technical, economic, performance and marketing advantages of U.S. cotton and to address import commercial issues fueling the world cotton textile trade.

  5. Regional Agricultural Promotion Program (RAPP): CCI uses Regional Agricultural Promotion Program (RAPP) - Tranche I & II funding to diversify and expand market opportunities for U.S. food and agricultural products beyond the traditional top customers. Focus is on enhancing U.S. exports to new markets in parts of the world including South and Southeast Asia, Latin America, the Middle East and Africa, and others where the middle class is growing and the desire for high-quality food and farm products is increasing.

The 5 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($24M) Expenses 100 ($24M) Net assets 100 ($664k)2018 Revenue 101 ($24M) Expenses 101 ($24M) Net assets 94 ($626k)2019 Revenue 110 ($26M) Expenses 106 ($25M) Net assets 244 ($1.6M)2020 Revenue 107 ($25M) Expenses 106 ($25M) Net assets 254 ($1.7M)2021 Revenue 120 ($28M) Expenses 121 ($28M) Net assets 233 ($1.5M)2022 Revenue 123 ($29M) Expenses 124 ($29M) Net assets 193 ($1.3M)2023 Revenue 111 ($26M) Expenses 111 ($26M) Net assets 177 ($1.2M)2024 Revenue 127 ($30M) Expenses 122 ($29M) Net assets 335 ($2.2M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (127)Expenses (122)Net assets (335)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $4.1M to $7.0M (+73%).

$4.1M
$7.0M
$9.5M
$6.9M
$8.0M
$8.0M
$7.5M
$8.4M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 83% · 2018 79% · 2019 79% · 2020 83% · 2021 86% · 2022 82% · 2023 82% · 2024 78%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$74k
’17
−$39k
’18
$980k
’19
$90k
’20
−$142k
’21
−$265k
’22
−$102k
’23
$1.0M
’24
0.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

20172018202220232024
Listed3842394340
Joined·+7·+7+6
No longer listed·3·39
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2020: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $90k → $40k.

Funder
'17
'18
'20
total
Croplife Americaunclassified
$30k
funders
2
1
1

Left out of every figure on this page: $2.5M from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest National Cotton Council of America). These are real filings, and they are not money Cotton Council International raised.

From the IRS filings of Cotton Council International’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Cotton Council International leans on a few funders — its largest provides 79% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Cotton Council International.

79%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 83% · 2018 100% · 2020 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

Cotton Council International draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, D.C., across 2 states in all.

CA
VA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’20
Washington, D.C. out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Government funding Cotton Council International receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $49.0M on record.

Federal$49.0M
grants $49.0Mcontracts $43k
18
24
26
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$49.0M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like Cotton Council International

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Governance

25
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

TN

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • National Cotton Council · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Cotton Council International: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Cotton Council International?
Cotton Council International (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $145,000 to it, the largest being CALIFORNIA COTTON ALLIANCE ($115,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Cotton Council International have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $145,000 in grants to Cotton Council International, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Cotton Council International?
CALIFORNIA COTTON ALLIANCE is the largest funder on record, with $115,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Cotton Council International find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Cotton Council International →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing