Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

Colorado · Nonprofit

COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK

COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK (Colorado) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $16,300 to it, the largest being THE WILLIAM B WIENER JR FOUNDATION ($15,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$1.8M
Revenue FY2025
3
Funders on record
$16k
Grants received
$10M
Net assets
1/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%

Against its field

COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK is better cushioned than half of the 9,072 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−17% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve4.5mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−5% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,072 education nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($2.8M) Expenses 100 ($965k) Net assets 100 ($3.9M)2018 Revenue 97 ($2.7M) Expenses 10 ($95k) Net assets 155 ($6.1M)2019 Revenue 7 ($195k) Expenses 8 ($76k) Net assets 162 ($6.4M)2020 Revenue 4 ($110k) Expenses 8 ($77k) Net assets 165 ($6.5M)2021 Revenue 104 ($2.9M) Expenses 78 ($754k) Net assets 244 ($9.6M)2022 Revenue 74 ($2.0M) Expenses 124 ($1.2M) Net assets 218 ($8.6M)2023 Revenue 53 ($1.5M) Expenses 155 ($1.5M) Net assets 231 ($9.1M)2024 Revenue 58 ($1.6M) Expenses 182 ($1.8M) Net assets 252 ($9.9M)2025 Revenue 65 ($1.8M) Expenses 218 ($2.1M) Net assets 259 ($10M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (65)Expenses (218)Net assets (259)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

64% of COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (48% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,312 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$1.8M
17
$2.6M
18
$119k
19
$33k
20
$2.1M
21
$835k
22
$38k
23
$170k
24
$298k
25
4.5
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $15k → $300.

Funder
'18
'22
'23
'24*
'25*
total
funders
2
1
1
1
1

From the IRS filings of COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK leans on a few funders — its largest provides 92% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

92% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK.

92%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 98% · 2022 100% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Colorado, across 3 states in all.

OH
CT
LA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

18
22
23
Colorado out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Colorado

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

85% of spending goes to programs.

Program 85%Management 3%Fundraising 12%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 40 states

AK
ME
NH
WA
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
FL

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Compassion & Choices · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK?
COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK (Colorado) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $16,300 to it, the largest being THE WILLIAM B WIENER JR FOUNDATION ($15,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $16,300 in grants to COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK?
THE WILLIAM B WIENER JR FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $15,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing