Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Massachusetts · Nonprofit

CLINTON GAELS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB

CLINTON GAELS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB (Massachusetts) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,740 to it, the largest being The Nypro Foundation Inc co Nypro Inc ($1,650). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$128k
Revenue FY2025
3
Funders on record
$3k
Grants received
$59k
Net assets
2/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 17%

Against its field

CLINTON GAELS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 15,926 education nonprofits its size.

Operating margin25% · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)56% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 15,926 education nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($4k) Expenses 100 ($9k) Net assets 100 ($8k)2018 Revenue 42 ($2k) Expenses 58 ($5k) Net assets 50 ($4k)2019 Revenue 298 ($11k) Expenses 78 ($7k) Net assets 97 ($8k)2020 Revenue 192 ($7k) Expenses 96 ($9k) Net assets 72 ($6k)2021 Revenue 6 ($215) Expenses 46 ($4k) Net assets 20 ($2k)2022 Revenue 863 ($32k) Expenses 250 ($24k) Net assets 127 ($10k)2023 Revenue 2875 ($106k) Expenses 1072 ($101k) Net assets 197 ($16k)2024 Revenue 3034 ($112k) Expenses 1068 ($101k) Net assets 348 ($27k)2025 Revenue 3456 ($128k) Expenses 1025 ($96k) Net assets 749 ($59k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (3456)Expenses (1025)Net assets (749)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

0% of CLINTON GAELS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (58% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 24,851 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$6k
17
$4k
18
$4k
19
$2k
20
$4k
21
$8k
22
$6k
23
$12k
24
$32k
25
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $260 → $550.

1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)26% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CLINTON GAELS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CLINTON GAELS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB leans on a few funders — its largest provides 60% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

26% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CLINTON GAELS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB.

60%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

81% of CLINTON GAELS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB's grant income comes from Massachusetts funders.

IL
MA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

18
19
23
Massachusetts out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $700 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 3 funders put you under-funded among the 229 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like CLINTON GAELS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Massachusetts

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

0%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CLINTON GAELS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CLINTON GAELS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB?
CLINTON GAELS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB (Massachusetts) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,740 to it, the largest being The Nypro Foundation Inc co Nypro Inc ($1,650). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CLINTON GAELS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $2,740 in grants to CLINTON GAELS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CLINTON GAELS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB?
The Nypro Foundation Inc co Nypro Inc is the largest funder on record, with $1,650 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CLINTON GAELS ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Massachusetts. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing