California · Nonprofit
CHINESE STRATEGY ALLIANCE
CHINESE STRATEGY ALLIANCE (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $30,050 to it, the largest being Chun L And Hsin Y Hsieh Family Foundation aka Cedar Lily Foundation ($30,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- Revenue FY2024
- $126k
- Funders on record
- 2
- Grants received
- $30k
- Net assets
- $141k
What Chinese Strategy Alliance does
Mission
God give us a version about unity and mission. The overall purpose is to connect the chinese church through all gospel strategies to build and maintain a collaborative christian society and to increase awareness of the chinese church share responsibility for the great commission among chinese churcres.
As stated on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ.
Programs
Regarding the unity of the chinese church in the united states
$32,939 spent31% of program spendingVoice of middle east
$19,095 spent18% of program spendingChallenges to reach un-engaged un-reached people groups (uupgs)
$54,901 spent51% of program spending
The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $106,935.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $57k to $89k (+57%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
100% of CHINESE STRATEGY ALLIANCE’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (91% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
Who funds it, year by year
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
From the IRS filings of CHINESE STRATEGY ALLIANCE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
CHINESE STRATEGY ALLIANCE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 100% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
CHINESE STRATEGY ALLIANCE draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside California, across 2 states in all.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
CHINESE STRATEGY ALLIANCE runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 21,616 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 21,616 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2024
Organizations like CHINESE STRATEGY ALLIANCE
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In California
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
88%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CHINESE STRATEGY ALLIANCE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds CHINESE STRATEGY ALLIANCE?
- CHINESE STRATEGY ALLIANCE (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $30,050 to it, the largest being Chun L And Hsin Y Hsieh Family Foundation aka Cedar Lily Foundation ($30,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does CHINESE STRATEGY ALLIANCE have?
- IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $30,050 in grants to CHINESE STRATEGY ALLIANCE, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of CHINESE STRATEGY ALLIANCE?
- Chun L And Hsin Y Hsieh Family Foundation aka Cedar Lily Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $30,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like CHINESE STRATEGY ALLIANCE find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Chinese Strategy Alliance →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2019–2024), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing