Loading…
Loading…
North Carolina · Nonprofit
CHILD CARE CONNECTIONS OF BURKE CO (North Carolina) is funded by 3 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $7,627,355 in grants to it, the largest being BURKE COUNTY SMART START INC ($7,345,273). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
CHILD CARE CONNECTIONS OF BURKE CO has grown faster than half of the 10,742 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 10,742 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2023
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
100% of CHILD CARE CONNECTIONS OF BURKE CO’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (81% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
$78k from 2 funders in 2025, up from $1.4M and 2 in 2020.
From the IRS filings of CHILD CARE CONNECTIONS OF BURKE CO’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
CHILD CARE CONNECTIONS OF BURKE CO leans on a few funders — its largest provides 96% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 99% · 2021 99% · 2022 99% · 2023 95% · 2024 95% · 2025 71% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
CHILD CARE CONNECTIONS OF BURKE CO is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from North Carolina funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
100% of spending goes to programs.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2018–2023), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing