Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Illinois · Nonprofit

Chicago Votes Action Fund

Chicago Votes Action Fund (Illinois) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $880,789 to it, the largest being CHICAGO INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION INC ($320,500). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$59k
Revenue FY2024
6
Funders on record
$881k
Grants received
$-1969
Net assets
5/6 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 85%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($119k) Expenses 100 ($125k) Net assets 100 ($9k)2018 Revenue 231 ($275k) Expenses 58 ($73k) Net assets 2352 ($210k)2019 Revenue 154 ($183k) Expenses 117 ($147k) Net assets 2753 ($246k)2020 Revenue 283 ($335k) Expenses 141 ($177k) Net assets 4526 ($405k)2021 Revenue 157 ($186k) Expenses 111 ($139k) Net assets 5052 ($452k)2022 Revenue 204 ($242k) Expenses 254 ($318k) Net assets 4202 ($376k)2023 Revenue 121 ($144k) Expenses 329 ($412k) Net assets 1194 ($107k)2024 Revenue 50 ($59k) Expenses 134 ($168k) Net assets -22 ($-1969)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (50)Expenses (134)Net assets (-22)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$7k
17
$201k
18
$36k
19
$158k
20
$47k
21
$76k
22
$269k
23
$109k
24
1.8
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income rose $45k → $52k.

1 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)4% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Chicago Votes Action Fund’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Chicago Votes Action Fund leans on a few funders — its largest provides 36% of grant income and the top three 86%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Chicago Votes Action Fund.

36%
largest funder
86%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 89% · 2018 56% · 2019 57% · 2020 45% · 2021 50% · 2022 47% · 2023 80%diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

Chicago Votes Action Fund draws 99% of its grant income from funders outside Illinois, across 4 states in all.

IL
MA
CO
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Illinois out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $37k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 6 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like Chicago Votes Action Fund

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Illinois

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

75% of spending goes to programs.

Program 75%Management 25%Fundraising 0%

Governance

10
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

IL

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Chicago Votes · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Chicago Votes Action Fund: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Chicago Votes Action Fund?
Chicago Votes Action Fund (Illinois) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $880,789 to it, the largest being CHICAGO INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION INC ($320,500). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Chicago Votes Action Fund have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $880,789 in grants to Chicago Votes Action Fund, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Chicago Votes Action Fund?
CHICAGO INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $320,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Chicago Votes Action Fund find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Illinois. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 6funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing