Illinois · Nonprofit
CHICAGO CHROMATOGRAPHY DISCUSSION GROUP
CHICAGO CHROMATOGRAPHY DISCUSSION GROUP (Illinois) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $30 to it, the largest being AbbVie Foundation ($30). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
CHICAGO CHROMATOGRAPHY DISCUSSION GROUP runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 458 science & tech nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 458 science & tech nonprofits under $100k, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Illinois Action for Childrenlocal
- Carol Oppenheim and Jerome S Lamet Charitable Fundportfolio match
- Harper Court Arts Council Incportfolio match
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
60% of CHICAGO CHROMATOGRAPHY DISCUSSION GROUP’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (89% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
Who funds it, year by year
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
From the IRS filings of CHICAGO CHROMATOGRAPHY DISCUSSION GROUP’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
100% of CHICAGO CHROMATOGRAPHY DISCUSSION GROUP's grant income comes from Illinois funders.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Illinois Action for ChildrenlocalIL · funds 237 organizations near you
- Carol Oppenheim and Jerome S Lamet Charitable Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Harper Court Arts Council Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Chicago Federation of Labor and Industrial Union Councilportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Chicago Journeymen Plumbers' Local Union 130 Uaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Anne E Leibowitz Fund Co Joy Segalportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Milhouse Charitiesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- American College of Cardiologyportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Illinois Humanities Council Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Helmsmanshipincportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Personal Care Products Council Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Dryer Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like CHICAGO CHROMATOGRAPHY DISCUSSION GROUP
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Illinois
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CHICAGO CHROMATOGRAPHY DISCUSSION GROUP: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds CHICAGO CHROMATOGRAPHY DISCUSSION GROUP?
- CHICAGO CHROMATOGRAPHY DISCUSSION GROUP (Illinois) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $30 to it, the largest being AbbVie Foundation ($30). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does CHICAGO CHROMATOGRAPHY DISCUSSION GROUP have?
- IRS filings report 1 organization giving $30 in grants to CHICAGO CHROMATOGRAPHY DISCUSSION GROUP.
- Who is the largest funder of CHICAGO CHROMATOGRAPHY DISCUSSION GROUP?
- AbbVie Foundation is the largest funder on record, with $30 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like CHICAGO CHROMATOGRAPHY DISCUSSION GROUP find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Illinois. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 1funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing