Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Colorado · Nonprofit

CENTER FOR PERFORMANCE AND CIVIC PRACTICE

CENTER FOR PERFORMANCE AND CIVIC PRACTICE (Colorado) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $770,000 to it, the largest being THE ANDREW W MELLON FOUNDATION ($720,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$11k
Revenue FY2024
2
Funders on record
$770k
Grants received
$134k
Net assets
1/2 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year

Against its field

CENTER FOR PERFORMANCE AND CIVIC PRACTICE's funding has concentrated — grant income rose while the number of funders held roughly flat.

Operating margin−1220% · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−43% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 14,524 arts & culture nonprofits under $100k, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($562k) Expenses 100 ($324k) Net assets 100 ($456k)2018 Revenue 58 ($329k) Expenses 142 ($461k) Net assets 71 ($324k)2019 Revenue 44 ($247k) Expenses 93 ($303k) Net assets 59 ($268k)2020 Revenue 35 ($194k) Expenses 81 ($264k) Net assets 44 ($199k)2021 Revenue 92 ($516k) Expenses 57 ($185k) Net assets 116 ($530k)2022 Revenue 22 ($122k) Expenses 84 ($272k) Net assets 83 ($380k)2023 Revenue 15 ($85k) Expenses 61 ($196k) Net assets 59 ($269k)2024 Revenue 2 ($11k) Expenses 45 ($146k) Net assets 29 ($134k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (2)Expenses (45)Net assets (29)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

0% of CENTER FOR PERFORMANCE AND CIVIC PRACTICE’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (78% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 18,745 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$239k
17
$132k
18
$56k
19
$69k
20
$331k
21
$150k
22
$111k
23
$135k
24
35
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2020: the base held at 1 funder, grant income rose $300k → $420k.

From the IRS filings of CENTER FOR PERFORMANCE AND CIVIC PRACTICE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CENTER FOR PERFORMANCE AND CIVIC PRACTICE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 94% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

94%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

CENTER FOR PERFORMANCE AND CIVIC PRACTICE draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Colorado, across 1 state in all.

NY

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
19
20
Colorado out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 2 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like CENTER FOR PERFORMANCE AND CIVIC PRACTICE

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Colorado

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

0%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OR

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CENTER FOR PERFORMANCE AND CIVIC PRACTICE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CENTER FOR PERFORMANCE AND CIVIC PRACTICE?
CENTER FOR PERFORMANCE AND CIVIC PRACTICE (Colorado) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $770,000 to it, the largest being THE ANDREW W MELLON FOUNDATION ($720,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CENTER FOR PERFORMANCE AND CIVIC PRACTICE have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $770,000 in grants to CENTER FOR PERFORMANCE AND CIVIC PRACTICE, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CENTER FOR PERFORMANCE AND CIVIC PRACTICE?
THE ANDREW W MELLON FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $720,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CENTER FOR PERFORMANCE AND CIVIC PRACTICE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing