Loading…
Loading…
Iowa · Nonprofit
CEDAR RAPIDS SCOTTISH RITE (Iowa) is funded by 2 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $15,132 in grants to it, the largest being ANCIENT & ACCEPTED SCOTTISH RITE VALLEY ($13,132). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
CEDAR RAPIDS SCOTTISH RITE holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 20,094 education nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 20,094 education nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The base broadened — 1 funders to 2 as grant income moved $500 → $4k.
From the IRS filings of CEDAR RAPIDS SCOTTISH RITE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
CEDAR RAPIDS SCOTTISH RITE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 87% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 95% · 2021 89% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
CEDAR RAPIDS SCOTTISH RITE is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Iowa funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2019–2024), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing