Skip to content

Montana · Nonprofit

CAMP PAXSON PRESERVATION PROJECT

CAMP PAXSON PRESERVATION PROJECT (Montana) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $22,100 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($12,500). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 57% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$210k
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$22k
Net assets
$168k
0/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%
01What it does

What Camp Paxson Preservation Project does

Mission

To preserve and improve historic camp paxson and to advance the public's appreciation of this cultural and natural resource both locally and regionally through expanded appropriate use.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. We are continuing to grow our place-based outdoor education program Larch Outdoor Education Center." The goal for this program is: to serve youth with place-based, experiential outdoor educational opportunities, building a positive sense of connection and appreciation to their world and to each other. This falls under our current mission. We piloted this program in the fall of 2021, launched in spring of 2022.

    $172,448 spent$194,686 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2024 Form 990. Program spending in total: $172,448.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($103k) Expenses 100 ($105k) Net assets 100 ($48k)2018 Revenue 115 ($118k) Expenses 106 ($111k) Net assets 114 ($55k)2019 Revenue 117 ($120k) Expenses 96 ($101k) Net assets 154 ($74k)2020 Revenue 96 ($99k) Expenses 97 ($102k) Net assets 148 ($71k)2022 Revenue 153 ($157k) Expenses 155 ($162k) Net assets 169 ($81k)2023 Revenue 202 ($208k) Expenses 153 ($160k) Net assets 269 ($129k)2024 Revenue 200 ($205k) Expenses 168 ($176k) Net assets 332 ($159k)2025 Revenue 204 ($210k) Expenses 192 ($201k) Net assets 352 ($168k)
'17'18'19'20'22'23'24'25
Revenue (204)Expenses (192)Net assets (352)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $98k to $148k (+51%).

$52k
$61k
$82k
$79k
$98k
$148k
$179k
$186k
'17'18'19'20'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

7% of CAMP PAXSON PRESERVATION PROJECT’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,547 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$2k
’17
$7k
’18
$19k
’19
−$3k
’20
−$5k
’22
$48k
’23
$30k
’24
$9k
’25
11
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

202320242025
Listed789
Joined·+1+1
No longer listed·00
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 57% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CAMP PAXSON PRESERVATION PROJECT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CAMP PAXSON PRESERVATION PROJECT leans on a few funders — its largest provides 57% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

57% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CAMP PAXSON PRESERVATION PROJECT.

57%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

57% of CAMP PAXSON PRESERVATION PROJECT's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $10k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Montana funders.

MT

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $13k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

CAMP PAXSON PRESERVATION PROJECT is better cushioned than half of the 11,634 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin4% · below the median
Months of reserve10.6mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)9% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,634 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Government funding CAMP PAXSON PRESERVATION PROJECT receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $46k on record.

Federal$46k
grants $0contracts $46k
Top agencies
  • Department of Agriculture$46k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like CAMP PAXSON PRESERVATION PROJECT

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Montana

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

86% of spending goes to programs.

Program 86%Management 14%Fundraising 0%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

96%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CAMP PAXSON PRESERVATION PROJECT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CAMP PAXSON PRESERVATION PROJECT?
CAMP PAXSON PRESERVATION PROJECT (Montana) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $22,100 to it, the largest being FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ($12,500). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 57% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does CAMP PAXSON PRESERVATION PROJECT have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $22,100 in grants to CAMP PAXSON PRESERVATION PROJECT.
Who is the largest funder of CAMP PAXSON PRESERVATION PROJECT?
FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND is the largest funder on record, with $12,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CAMP PAXSON PRESERVATION PROJECT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Montana. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Camp Paxson Preservation Project →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing