Skip to content
Plinth
Funding

California · Nonprofit

CALIFORNIA WOMEN FOR AGRICULTURE

CALIFORNIA WOMEN FOR AGRICULTURE (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,750 to it, the largest being Palo Verde Valley Community Improvement Fund ($5,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$389k
Revenue FY2024
3
Funders on record
$9k
Grants received
$1.6M
Net assets
0/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($242k) Expenses 100 ($244k) Net assets 100 ($1.4M)2018 Revenue 108 ($261k) Expenses 110 ($268k) Net assets 99 ($1.4M)2019 Revenue 86 ($207k) Expenses 73 ($178k) Net assets 101 ($1.4M)2020 Revenue 92 ($222k) Expenses 108 ($264k) Net assets 99 ($1.4M)2021 Revenue 94 ($227k) Expenses 84 ($205k) Net assets 102 ($1.4M)2022 Revenue 195 ($472k) Expenses 87 ($211k) Net assets 113 ($1.6M)2023 Revenue 133 ($320k) Expenses 150 ($367k) Net assets 110 ($1.5M)2024 Revenue 161 ($389k) Expenses 146 ($356k) Net assets 116 ($1.6M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (161)Expenses (146)Net assets (116)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$3k
17
$7k
18
$29k
19
$43k
20
$22k
21
$261k
22
$47k
23
$33k
24
46
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

From the IRS filings of CALIFORNIA WOMEN FOR AGRICULTURE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CALIFORNIA WOMEN FOR AGRICULTURE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 57% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

57%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of CALIFORNIA WOMEN FOR AGRICULTURE's grant income comes from California funders.

CA

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like CALIFORNIA WOMEN FOR AGRICULTURE

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

75% of spending goes to programs.

Program 75%Management 25%Fundraising 0%

Governance

6
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CALIFORNIA WOMEN FOR AGRICULTURE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CALIFORNIA WOMEN FOR AGRICULTURE?
CALIFORNIA WOMEN FOR AGRICULTURE (California) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,750 to it, the largest being Palo Verde Valley Community Improvement Fund ($5,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does CALIFORNIA WOMEN FOR AGRICULTURE have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $8,750 in grants to CALIFORNIA WOMEN FOR AGRICULTURE.
Who is the largest funder of CALIFORNIA WOMEN FOR AGRICULTURE?
Palo Verde Valley Community Improvement Fund is the largest funder on record, with $5,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CALIFORNIA WOMEN FOR AGRICULTURE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing