Loading…
Loading…
California · Nonprofit
BEVERLY HILLS SYNAGOGUE (California) is funded by 5 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $26,700 in grants to it, the largest being THE ALON AND ROSANA MILLER FOUNDATION ($22,500). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Grant income rose $2k → $10k on a roughly flat funder count — a concentrated base.
From the IRS filings of BEVERLY HILLS SYNAGOGUE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
BEVERLY HILLS SYNAGOGUE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 84% of grant income and the top three 96%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 45% · 2018 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 79% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
BEVERLY HILLS SYNAGOGUE is locally rooted: 93% of its grant income comes from California funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 5 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2024–2024), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing