Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

California · Nonprofit

Audacious Foundation

Audacious Foundation (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $329,942 to it, the largest being NATALIE ORFALEA FOUNDATION ($328,942). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$1.8M
Revenue FY2025
2
Funders on record
$330k
Grants received
$2.8M
Net assets
1/2 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%

Against its field

Audacious Foundation is better cushioned than half of the 1,336 philanthropy nonprofits its size.

Months of reserve5.1mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)10% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,336 philanthropy nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($867k) Expenses 100 ($5.3M) Net assets 100 ($4.3M)2018 Revenue 110 ($956k) Expenses 50 ($2.7M) Net assets 74 ($3.2M)2019 Revenue 414 ($3.6M) Expenses 56 ($3.0M) Net assets 114 ($4.8M)2020 Revenue 94 ($813k) Expenses 16 ($837k) Net assets 146 ($6.2M)2021 Revenue 125 ($1.1M) Expenses 9 ($493k) Net assets 170 ($7.2M)2022 Revenue 49 ($426k) Expenses 30 ($1.6M) Net assets 122 ($5.2M)2023 Revenue 100 ($863k) Expenses 32 ($1.7M) Net assets 98 ($4.2M)2024 Revenue 122 ($1.1M) Expenses 35 ($1.9M) Net assets 73 ($3.1M)2025 Revenue 213 ($1.8M) Expenses 31 ($1.6M) Net assets 66 ($2.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (213)Expenses (31)Net assets (66)Peer revenue range
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2021: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $50k → $29k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
total
funders
1
1
2
1
1

From the IRS filings of Audacious Foundation’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Audacious Foundation leans on a few funders — its largest provides 100% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 99% · 2020 100% · 2021 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of Audacious Foundation's grant income comes from California funders.

CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like Audacious Foundation

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Audacious Foundation: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Audacious Foundation?
Audacious Foundation (California) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $329,942 to it, the largest being NATALIE ORFALEA FOUNDATION ($328,942). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Audacious Foundation have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $329,942 in grants to Audacious Foundation, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Audacious Foundation?
NATALIE ORFALEA FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $328,942 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Audacious Foundation find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 2funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing