Loading…
Loading…
Missouri · Nonprofit
Ascension Medical Group Michigan (Missouri) is funded by 7 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $269,633 in grants to it, the largest being ASCENSION ST JOHN FOUNDATION (FKA ST JOHN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION) ($129,486). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Ascension Medical Group Michigan has grown faster than half of the 4,494 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 4,494 health nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2023
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
0% of Ascension Medical Group Michigan’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (7% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.
The base broadened — 1 funders to 7 as grant income moved $5k → $232k.
From the IRS filings of Ascension Medical Group Michigan’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
Ascension Medical Group Michigan leans on a few funders — its largest provides 48% of grant income and the top three 76%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 40% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
Ascension Medical Group Michigan is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Missouri funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
52% of spending goes to programs.
73%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Part of a family of 338 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2018–2023), and the filings of 7funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing