Loading…
Loading…
Tennessee · Nonprofit
APPLIED MEDICAL RESEARCH INC (Tennessee) is funded by 3 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $5,371,000 in grants to it, the largest being DREYFUS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ($5,350,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
APPLIED MEDICAL RESEARCH INC has grown faster than three-quarters of the 9,383 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,383 health nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
0% of APPLIED MEDICAL RESEARCH INC’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (70% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.
$850k from 1 funders in 2023, up from $1.4M and 1 in 2020.
From the IRS filings of APPLIED MEDICAL RESEARCH INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
APPLIED MEDICAL RESEARCH INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 100% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 99% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
APPLIED MEDICAL RESEARCH INC draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Tennessee — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 2 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
100% of spending goes to programs.
Operates in 2 states
Part of a family of 19 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2018–2024), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing