Loading…
Loading…
Tennessee · Nonprofit
Alliance Health Services Inc (Tennessee) is funded by 3 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $3,674,072 in grants to it, the largest being Methodist Healthcare Foundation ($2,446,826). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Alliance Health Services Inc's revenue fell 26% between 2017 and 2024.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,322 health nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
1% of Alliance Health Services Inc’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (7% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 8 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$86k from 1 funders in 2025, up from $606k and 1 in 2017.
From the IRS filings of Alliance Health Services Inc’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
Alliance Health Services Inc leans on a few funders — its largest provides 67% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 64% · 2019 54% · 2020 54% · 2021 72% · 2022 69% · 2023 65% · 2024 64% · 2025 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
Alliance Health Services Inc is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Tennessee funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 3 funders put you under-funded among the 243 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
80% of spending goes to programs.
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Part of a family of 13 related entities
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing