Skip to content
Ask
← Funding

Washington, D.C. · Nonprofit

AKADEMIYA2063

AKADEMIYA2063 (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $17,100 to it, the largest being NEW VENTURE FUND ($17,100). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$3.4M
Funders on record
1
Grants received
$17k
Net assets
$133k
0/1 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 0%
01What it does

What Akademiya2063 does

Mission

AKADEMIYA2063's overall mission is to create, across Africa, state-of-the-art technical capacities to support African Union Member States to achieve the key goals of Agenda 2063 of transforming national economies to boost growth and prosperity.The main goal of AKADEMIYA2063 is to help meet the needs of African countries in terms of data, analytics and mutual learning for the effective implementation of Agenda 2063 and the realization of its outcomes by a critical mass of Member States.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

On its FY2024 return the organization reported starting a significant new program and a significant change in how it conducts a program.

The EO received the following new funding during the reporting period (1) A 60-month funding from USAID for a project titled "Feed the Future Policy Support for African Food Systems". However, this funding was terminated in January 2025 following the shift in USG funding priorities (2) A 6-month funding from the European Delegation of Kigali for a project titled "Review of Rwanda's National Agricultural Export Development Strategic Business Plan (SBP) 2019-2024" (3) A 14-month funding by GIZ to provide technical support for the development and implementation of the Post-Malabo Agenda (4) A 10-month funding from GIZ to support to the AU Extraordinary Summit in Kampala, Uganda, and (5) A one-year bridge funding from BMGF for the establishment of Africa Food Systems Authority (AFSA).

Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 2).

A few projects and initiatives achieved its objectives during the year hence their activities ceased as per the terms of the contracts. These were the: (1) Program of Accompanying Research and for Agricultural Innovation (PARI)" funded by BMZ, Germany (2) Research and Services Network (A Hub) for Responsible Artificial Intelligence for Climate Action Innovation in Africa [RESEN-RAICAIA], a project funded by IDRC through WASCAL (3) Africa Agricultural Trade and Food Security Monitoring funded by USAID through DAI-Global. Some of these program services though having come to an end before the current reporting period, had residual costs that were paid and reported in the current period.

Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 3).

  1. The Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS) Program provides data and related analytical and knowledge products to facilitate CAADP benchmarking. These activities are carried out in African Union (AU) member states, as need arises.

    $770,943 spentof which $42,500 as grants
    26% of program spending

  2. Feed the Future Policy Analysis for African Agri-Food Systems (PAAS). Project activities are African-wide.

    $709,793 spent
    24% of program spending

  3. Digitally Enabled Resilience and Nutrition Policy Innovations (DERPIn) Project has activities in Rwanda, Senegal, Malawi, Ghana and Uganda. It works in close collaboration with in-country partners in these countries.

    $600,079 spentof which $67,945 as grants
    20% of program spending

  4. Malabo Montpellier (MaMo) Panel Activities

    $203,308 spent
    7% of program spending

  5. The Agriculture/Agrifood Systems and Climate Action (ASCA-IPO I & II) Project

    $196,738 spent
    7% of program spending

  6. Improving Sanitary and Phytosanitary Systems (SPS) in Africa Program

    $153,811 spent
    5% of program spending

  7. Food Systems Policy Coherence (FSPC) Assessment Program

    $66,416 spent
    2% of program spending

  8. Support for the Implementation of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change in Africa (CACCI Project)

    $47,123 spent
    2% of program spending

  9. The African Agriculture Trade Monitor (AATM) Program

    $23,305 spent
    1% of program spending

  10. The Policy, Evidence, Analytics, Research and Learning (PEARL) project

    $22,478 spentof which $42,500 as grants
    1% of program spending

  11. Other Projects - Ukama Ustawi,BMGF-AFSA, PSTA 5, GIZ-AU EO Summit, FSRP and NAEB projects

    $177,922 spentof which $17,472 as grants
    6% of program spending

The 11 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $2,971,916.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2021, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2021, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20212021 Revenue 100 ($5.2M) Expenses 100 ($5.1M) Net assets 100 ($72k)2022 Revenue 95 ($4.9M) Expenses 96 ($4.9M) Net assets 103 ($74k)2023 Revenue 153 ($7.9M) Expenses 152 ($7.7M) Net assets 333 ($238k)2024 Revenue 66 ($3.4M) Expenses 75 ($3.8M) Net assets 185 ($133k)
2021202220232024
Revenue (66)Expenses (75)Net assets (185)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $2.4M to $3.4M (+39%).

$1.6M
$2.4M
$3.4M
$3.1M
2021202220232024
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 87% · 2022 50% · 2023 65% · 2024 50%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

87% of AKADEMIYA2063’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (97% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,679 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 4 reported years ran a deficit.

$72k
’21
$2k
’22
$165k
’23
−$422k
’24
1.9
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Dr Ousmane Badiane

Executive Chairman

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

2021202220232024
Listed15172224
Joined·+2+6+6
No longer listed·014
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

Funder
'23
total
funders
1

1 of 1 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 100% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of AKADEMIYA2063’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

100% of AKADEMIYA2063's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Too little is directly attributable to place on a map.

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $17k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

AKADEMIYA2063's revenue fell 34% between 2021 and 2024.

Operating margin−12% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve1.9mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−13% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,607 international nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like AKADEMIYA2063

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington, D.C.

African Center for Economic Transformation71%Rights and Resources Institute Inc71%Cadasta Foundation71%African Wildlife Foundation Inc70%Cooperative League of the United States of America70%Health Systems Insight69%Arrow69%Agriculture & Food Systems Institute68%

Nationally

Auschwitz Institute for the Prevention of Genocide and Mass Atrocities73%Raffaella Foundation72%Africa Minigrid Developers Association Inc72%Village Empowerment Inc72%Education Development Center Inc71%Land O'Lakes Venture3771%African Center for Economic Transformation71%Rights and Resources Institute Inc71%
05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

78% of spending goes to programs.

Program 78%Management 22%Fundraising 0%

Governance

8
board members
75%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention–Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

PA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for AKADEMIYA2063: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds AKADEMIYA2063?
AKADEMIYA2063 (Washington, D.C.) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $17,100 to it, the largest being NEW VENTURE FUND ($17,100). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 100% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does AKADEMIYA2063 have?
IRS filings report 1 organization giving $17,100 in grants to AKADEMIYA2063.
Who is the largest funder of AKADEMIYA2063?
NEW VENTURE FUND is the largest funder on record, with $17,100 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like AKADEMIYA2063 find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington, D.C.. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Akademiya2063 →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2021–2024), and the filings of 1 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing