Loading…
Loading…
Vermont · Nonprofit
Addison County River Watch Collaborative Inc (Vermont) is funded by 3 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $114,525 in grants to it, the largest being WATERSHEDS UNITED VERMONT INC ($75,133). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Addison County River Watch Collaborative Inc runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 3,043 environment nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,043 environment nonprofits under $100k, FY2024
The base broadened — 1 funders to 2 as grant income moved $7k → $65k.
1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 23% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Addison County River Watch Collaborative Inc’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
Addison County River Watch Collaborative Inc leans on a few funders — its largest provides 66% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 100% · 2022 51% · 2023 100% · 2024 60% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
Addison County River Watch Collaborative Inc is locally rooted: 100% of its grant income comes from Vermont funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 3 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $51k on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2024–2024), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing