Oregon · Nonprofit
659 LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATION
659 LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATION (Oregon) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $20,000 to it, the largest being NECA-IBEW NATIONAL LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION COMMITTEE TRUST FUND ($20,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workersshared fundersportfolio match
- American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizationsshared fundersportfolio match
- United Way of Jackson County Inclocal
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.
Who funds it, year by year
Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.
From the IRS filings of 659 LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
659 LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATION draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Oregon, across 1 state in all.
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workersshared fundersportfolio matchDC · backs 3 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizationsshared fundersportfolio matchDC · backs 2 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- United Way of Jackson County InclocalOR · funds 35 organizations near you
- Laborers International Union of North America - District Council of Mn and Ndportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Midwest Region Organizing Committeeportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United Steelworkers Intl Group Returnportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Service Employees International Union Local No 99portfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Grand Lodge International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workersportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- United Food and Commercial Workers International Unionportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Laborers Employers Cooperation and Education Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- California Nurses Associationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Service Employees International Union Healthcare Minnesota and Iowaportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like 659 LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATION
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Oregon
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for 659 LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds 659 LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATION?
- 659 LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATION (Oregon) receives grants from 1 organization whose IRS filings report $20,000 to it, the largest being NECA-IBEW NATIONAL LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION COMMITTEE TRUST FUND ($20,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does 659 LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATION have?
- IRS filings report 1 organization giving $20,000 in grants to 659 LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATION.
- Who is the largest funder of 659 LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATION?
- NECA-IBEW NATIONAL LABOR-MANAGEMENT COOPERATION COMMITTEE TRUST FUND is the largest funder on record, with $20,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like 659 LABOR MANAGEMENT COOPERATION find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oregon. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 1funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing