Skip to content

Alaska · Nonprofit

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF TANANA VALLEY

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF TANANA VALLEY (Alaska) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $19,000 to it, the largest being Schwab Charitable Fund ($10,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2023
$4k
Funders on record
2
Grants received
$19k
Net assets
$23k
0/2 repeat funders
01The organization over time
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

Grant support over time, funder by funder — shade shows the grant size each year.

1 of 2 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 53% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF TANANA VALLEY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.

How concentrated its funding is

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF TANANA VALLEY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 53% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

53%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.

Where its funders are

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF TANANA VALLEY draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Alaska, across 2 states in all.

CO
DC

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing.

03Its place in the field

Against its field

LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF TANANA VALLEY receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $19k to it.

Operating margin−39% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,027 civil rights nonprofits under $100k, FY2023

Organizations like LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF TANANA VALLEY

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Alaska

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF TANANA VALLEY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF TANANA VALLEY?
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF TANANA VALLEY (Alaska) receives grants from 2 organizations whose IRS filings report $19,000 to it, the largest being Schwab Charitable Fund ($10,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF TANANA VALLEY have?
IRS filings report 2 organizations giving $19,000 in grants to LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF TANANA VALLEY.
Who is the largest funder of LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF TANANA VALLEY?
Schwab Charitable Fund is the largest funder on record, with $10,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF TANANA VALLEY find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Alaska. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds League of Women Voters of Tanana Valley →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2023–2023), and the filings of 2 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. What this page cannot tell you · view filing