Skip to content

· Private foundation

Zayas Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$1.8MEducation$233kCivil Rights$23kInternational$16kYouth Development$15kCommunity Improvement$7kFood & Nutrition$6kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$219k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PUNTO COMETA CHARITY$3,500
FUNDACION ALIMENTAR COLOMBIA CHARIT$2,500
AKBAR PRAY FOUNDATION FOR CHANGE$2,000
GLOBAL GIVING GRUPO PUNTACANA$2,000
CHILDREN INTERNATIONAL$698
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN CHARITY$210
MJR LOVE CHARITY$209
NO ONE LEFT BEHIND$106
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NO ONE LEFT BEHIND: $106 → 7%SINGLE PARENT RESOURCE CENTER: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
NJ
MO
VA
AZ
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 10 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
35

Total granted

$2.1M
$74k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+3%

Still filing today

40%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FT
    FOR THE GWORLS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1.8M
  • TF
    TRANS FORMATIVE SCHOOLS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $188k
  • GG
    GEM GIRLS EMPOWERING MOTHERS
    2× · 2020–2021 · $15k

Funded once

  • YM
    YOUNG MAN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2020 · $11k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • FP
    FELICIAS PROMISE CHARITY
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Youth Foundation

Iyf is a global ngo that prepares young people to be healthy, productive and engaged citizens.

International
2
Bigs & Littles Nyc Mentoring Inc

Bigs & littles nyc mentoring is a nonprofit community-based organization which transforms the lives of vulnerable nyc children and strengthens families through professionally guided one-to-one mentoring, life skills programming, and…

—
3
Childfund International Usa

Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…

International
4
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
5
She-Can Global Inc

The world is grappling with complex problems, including climate change, war, poverty, and ongoing human rights violations. These issues disproportionately impact women, particularly in developing countries. In nations recovering from…

Education
6
The Partnership for After School Education Inc

The partnership for after school education is a child-focused organization that promotes and supports quality after school programs, particularly those serving young people from underserved communities. the partnership for after school…

Education
7
Save the Children Federation Inc

Save the children is an international nonprofit children's relief and development organization. our mission is to inspire breakthroughs in the way the world treats children and to achieve immediate and lasting change in their lives.

International
8
Gratitude Global

Working through social entrepreneurs to impact the lives of children globally. the gratitude network seeks out the worlds most dynamic and innovative leaders and organizations impacting the lives of children and youth for competitive…

Philanthropy
9
Children's Rights Inc

Children's rights is a national advocacy organization that investigates, exposes, and combats violations of the rights of children. through strategic advocacy and civil rights impact litigation, children's rights holds governments…

Civil Rights
10
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
11
We Are Family Foundation

The we are family foundation celebrates the vision of a global family by creating and supporting programs that inspire and educate people about mutual respect, understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity.

Civil Rights
12
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children International; the most unlike its peers is By All Means Leadership Alliance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOR THE GWORLS INC: $1,814,630 · OtherFOR THE GWORLS INC+34 more: $112,424 · Other+34 moreTRANS FORMATIVE SCHOOLS INC: $187,532 · EducationTRANS FOR…Children International: $9,531 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,087 · InternationalOPERATION SMILE INC: $610 · International+1 more: $340 · InternationalXCEL STRATEGIES INC: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirls Embracing Mothers Inc: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentBY ALL MEANS LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentKEATONS KIDS INC: $313 · Youth DevelopmentSINGLE PARENT RESOURCE CENTER INC: $1,150 · Human ServicesNo One Left Behind: $106 · Human ServicesCITY HARVEST INC: $300 · Food & NutritionMENT LTD: $200 · Arts & CultureAmerican Liver Foundation: $52 · HealthNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $25 · Health
Other$1,927,054Education$187,532International$11,568Youth Development$5,313Human Services$1,256Food & Nutrition$300Arts & Culture$200Health$77

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetChildren International: $9,531 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetXCEL STRATEGIES INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGirls Embracing Mothers Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSINGLE PARENT RESOURCE CENTER INC: $1,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,087 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $610 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $340 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKEATONS KIDS INC: $313 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENT LTD: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Liver Foundation: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRANS FORMATIVE SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds Children International ↗
  • Who funds XCEL STRATEGIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Girls Embracing Mothers Inc ↗
  • Who funds SINGLE PARENT RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds BY ALL MEANS LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zayas Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zayas Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Zayas’ filings →

    More from the funding graph