Skip to content

· Private foundation

Zarinrosenfeld Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$1k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Zarinrosenfeld Family Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Schwab Charitable Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
3
’18
3
’19
1
’20
2
’21
2
’22
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$487kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kCivil Rights$10kHealth$5kPhilanthropy$2kInternational$1k
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,270
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHWAB CHARITABLE$1,270
SCHWAB CHARITABLE$872
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY: $5k → 16%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $69k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $25k → 10%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $43k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $43k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $42k → 17%BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $30k → 17%BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $25k → 17%BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $25k → 17%COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS: $1k → 17%BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE: $25k → 17%NYU COVID-19 RELIEF FUND: $50k → 17%NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL: $118k → 17%NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL: $43k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$462k · 3 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +76% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
4

Total granted

$462k
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+44%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
EducationCivil RightsHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    New York University
    4× · 2017–2022 · $196k · revenue +76%
  • NY
    NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $161k · revenue +14%
  • WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $105k · revenue +206%

Funded once

  • NC
    NYU COVID-19 RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
7/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

New York University: $196,428 · EducationNew York UniversityNEW YORK LAW SCHOOL: $160,714 · EducationNEW YORK LAW SCHOOLWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $105,000 · EducationWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INCNYU COVID-19 RELIEF FUND: $50,000 · OtherNYU COVID-19 RE…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF W…AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $10,000 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC: $5,000 · HealthDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $2,142 · PhilanthropyCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $1,000 · International
Education$462,142Other$75,000Civil Rights$10,000Health$5,000Philanthropy$2,142International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNew York University: $196,428 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK LAW SCHOOL: $160,714 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $105,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR DISCOVERY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC: $2,142 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Zarinrosenfeld Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Zarinrosenfeld Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Zarinrosenfeld Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph