Skip to content
YWCA of Greater Baton Rouge at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

YWCA of Greater Baton Rouge

The YWCA OF GREATER BATON ROUGE is dedicated to eliminating racism; empowering women; and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

$189k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Human Services$129kEducation$80kReligion$50kYouth Development$46kPublic Safety & Disaster$26kEmployment$25kArts & Culture$10kHealth$7k
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 16 grants below total $181,317, the rows itemized in this filing. The $188,740 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $7,423 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $144k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED CAJUN NAVY$20,000
2911 ACADEMY$20,000
UNBUNTU$18,648
HEART TO HEART$15,080
LARQUE MASSAGE$10,000
BAPTIST BUILDERS$10,000
2911 ACADEMY$10,000
CAPITAL HIGH ALUMNI$10,000
WHEEL QUEENS$10,000
H20 EXP$10,000
SPIRIT OF TRUTH$10,000
UPSTAGE$9,893
GUIDE A GIRL$7,500
LA ELITE SPORTS$7,500
METRO HEALTH$6,830
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%Fathers on a Mission (FOAM): $15k → 19%Baptist Builders International Inc: $10k → 19%BAPTIST BUILDERS: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$186k · 5 repeat orgs$186k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +421% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$186k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+421%
-11%

Still filing today

40%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 44% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $101k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesReligionPublic Safety & DisasterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 21
    29 11 ACADEMY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k
  • SO
    SPIRIT OF TRUTH INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · 47% of their budget
  • TH
    THE H2O EXPERIENCE INCORPORATED
    2× · 2023–2024 · $40k

Funded once

  • MB
    MID-CITY BAPTIST COMMUNITY FELLOWSHIP INC
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
  • EB
    EAST BATON ROUGE COUNCIL ON THE AGING INC
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • FF
    FOAM Fathers on a Mission
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
1/4
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

29 11 ACADEMY: $50,000 · Other29 11 ACADEMYTHE H2O EXPERIENCE INCORPORATED: $40,000 · OtherTHE H2O EXPERIENCE INCORPORATEDMID-CITY BAPTIST COMMUNITY FELLOWSHIP INC: $35,000 · OtherMID-CITY BAPTIST COMMUNITY FELLOWSHIP INCEAST BATON ROUGE COUNCIL ON THE AGING INC: $20,000 · OtherEAST BATON ROUGE COUNCIL ON THE AGING INCUBUNTU PROJECT BR: $18,648 · OtherUBUNTU PROJECT BRHEART TO HEART: $15,080 · OtherHEART TO HEARTDisciples Outreach Ministry: $15,000 · OtherDisciples Outreach MinistryLARQUE MASSAGE: $10,000 · OtherWHEEL QUEENS: $10,000 · OtherCAPITOL HIGH SCHOOL ALUMNI ASSOC: $10,000 · OtherUPSTAGE THEATRE COMPANY: $9,893 · Other+3 more: $20,866 · Other+3 moreSPIRIT OF TRUTH INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $50,000 · ReligionSPIRIT OF TRUTH…BAPTIST BUILDERS INTERNATIONAL INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesBAPTIST BU…FOAM Fathers on a Mission: $15,000 · Human ServicesFOAM Fathe…United Cajun Navy: $26,000 · Public Safety & DisasterBATON ROUGE BLACK ALCOHOLISM COUNCIL INC: $6,830 · Health
Other$254,487Religion$50,000Human Services$35,000Public Safety & Disaster$26,000Health$6,830

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPIRIT OF TRUTH INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES: $50,000 over 2y, 47% of budgetUnited Cajun Navy: $26,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFOAM Fathers on a Mission: $15,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetBATON ROUGE BLACK ALCOHOLISM COUNCIL INC: $6,830 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPIRIT OF TRUTH INTERNATIONAL MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds United Cajun Navy ↗
  • Who funds FOAM Fathers on a Mission ↗
  • Who funds BATON ROUGE BLACK ALCOHOLISM COUNCIL INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization YWCA of Greater Baton Rouge funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from YWCA of Greater Baton Rouge. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to YWCA of Greater Baton Rouge?

    Find your warmest path to YWCA of Greater Baton Rouge through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on YWCA of Greater Baton Rouge’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home