Skip to content

· Private foundation

Yin-Shun Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$420k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$142k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$2.1MInternational$229kFood & Nutrition$46kHuman Services$6k
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $79k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $327k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$86M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$141,800
Individual grant recipient$75,000
Light of Wisdom Dharma$60,300
Yin Shun Cultural Foundation$50,000
BUDDHIST GLOBAL RELIEF$30,000
WORLD FOOD PROGRAM$18,700
chiayi young buddhist assoc$10,000
MIAO YUN ARANYA FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
FARMLAND TREATMENT$6,000
Tzu-Chi Foundation$4,000
market street mission$2,000
lvmc$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 34% of grant dollars ($816k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 66% that went abroad ($1.6M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $19k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $10k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $6k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $6k → 14%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 66% of all-years giving ($1.6M)

3 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Taiwan$1.5M · 35 grants
Singapore$40k · 1 grant
Malaysia$10k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 18 repeat orgs$156k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +134% since the first grant, against +47% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
6

Total granted

$2.3M
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+134%
+47%

Still filing today

17%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BUDDHIST GLOBAL RELIEF A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $150k · revenue +134%
  • FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $46k · revenue +361%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    4× · 2018–2023 · $31k · revenue +89%

Funded once

  • BM
    Bodhi Monastery BM Operation Fund
    one grant, 2019 · $60k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $40k
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +47%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
4/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $567,150 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $353,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLight of Wisdom Dharma: $329,600 · OtherLight of Wisdom DharmaYin Shun Cultural Foundation: $232,000 · OtherYin Shun Cultural FoundationFUYAN BUDDHIST INSTITUTE: $166,120 · OtherFUYAN BUDDHIST INSTITUTEYinShun Cultural And Education: $80,000 · OtherMIAO YUN ARANYA FOUNDATION: $80,000 · Other+13 more: $346,000 · Other+13 moreBUDDHIST GLOBAL RELIEF A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $150,000 · InternationalBUDDHIST …MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $31,000 · InternationalMEDECINS …UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $20,000 · InternationalUNITED ST…GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $45,700 · Human Services
Other$2,153,870International$211,000Human Services$45,700

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBUDDHIST GLOBAL RELIEF A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $150,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $45,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $31,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BUDDHIST GLOBAL RELIEF A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yin-Shun Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yin-Shun Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yin-Shun’s filings →

    More from the funding graph