Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Washington · Public charity

Yakima Neighborhood Health Services

To improve the quality of life in our communities by providing accessible and integrated health and social services, ending homelessness, and offering unique learning opportunities for students of health professions.

$286k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
3
Grants FY2024
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

89% of Yakima Neighborhood Health Services’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Yakima Valley Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Median grant, FY2024
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$250,000
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$48M

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2024 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
YAKIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION dba NEW VISION FOUNDATION$25,00012%
Sozo Sports of Central Washington$6,50010%

Compare Yakima Neighborhood Health Services with peer funders

About Yakima Neighborhood Health Services

How much does Yakima Neighborhood Health Services give?
Yakima Neighborhood Health Services reported 3 grants totaling $285,600 in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Yakima Neighborhood Health Services fund?
By grant dollars over FY2024 to FY2024, its largest causes are Philanthropy (89%), Housing & Shelter (9%), Recreation & Sports (2%).
Who are Yakima Neighborhood Health Services's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2024 to FY2024: YAKIMA COUNTY DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION dba NEW VISION FOUNDATION ($25k), Sozo Sports of Central Washington ($7k).
Where is Yakima Neighborhood Health Services based?
Yakima Neighborhood Health Services is based in WA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 3 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $4k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Yakima Neighborhood Health Services’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home