Skip to content

· Public charity

Yadkin Valley United Fund Inc

To be the conduit which mobilizes the caring powers of the community for the betterment of the people in the yadkin valley.

$165k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$290kPublic Safety & Disaster$206kHousing & Shelter$149kHuman Services$114kReligion$42kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $120,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $165,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $44,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $87k
$14,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$309k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ECHO MINISTRY$20,000
TRICOUNTY CHRISTIAN CRISIS$20,000
TRICOUNTY HEALTH RESOURCE$18,000
MOUNTAIN PARK RESCUE SQUAD$15,000
Individual grant recipient$14,000
YADKIN VALLEY SENIOR CENTER$9,000
THE CHILDRENS CENTER OF SURRY$8,500
MERCY AND TRUTH MINISTRIES$5,500
CARENET COUNSELING OF ELKIN$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%YADKIN VALLEY SENIOR CENTER: $9k → 12%Tri-County Christian Crisis Ministr: $96k → 17%Yadkin Valley Senior Center: $9k → 12%ECHO MINISTRIES: $25k → 17%YADKIN VALLEY SENIOR CENTER: $9k → 12%Echo Ministry: $23k → 17%Yadkin Valley Senior Center: $9k → 12%Echo Ministry: $23k → 17%YADKIN VALLEY SENIOR CENTER: $9k → 12%ECHO MINISTRY: $22k → 17%YADKIN VALLEY SENIOR CENTER: $9k → 12%TRICOUNTY CHRISTIAN CRISIS: $22k → 17%Yadkin Valley Senior Center: $9k → 12%ECHO MINISTRY: $21k → 17%YADKIN VALLEY SENIOR CENTER: $9k → 12%ECHO MINISTRY: $21k → 17%ECHO MINISTRY: $20k → 17%Echo Ministry: $20k → 17%TRICOUNTY CHRISTIAN CRISIS: $20k → 17%TRI-COUNTY CHRISTIAN CRISIS: $19k → 17%TRICOUNTY HEALTH RESOURCE: $18k → 17%TRI-COUNTY HEALTH RESOURCE: $18k → 17%TRI-COUNTY HEALTH RESOURCE: $18k → 17%TRICOUNTY HEALTH RESOURCE: $18k → 17%Tri-County Health Resource Center: $18k → 17%Tri-County Health Resource Center: $18k → 17%Tri-County Health Resource Center: $18k → 17%Tri-County Christian Crisis Ministr: $18k → 17%TRI COUNTY HEALTH RESO: $17k → 17%TRI C CHRISTIAN CRISIS: $17k → 17%Tri-County Christian Crisis Ministr: $16k → 17%TRI-COUNTY CHRISTIAN CRISIS: $16k → 17%ELKIN RESCUE SQUAD: $15k → 17%ELKIN RESCUE SQUAD: $15k → 17%ELKIN RESCUE SQUAD: $15k → 17%Elkin Rescue Squad: $15k → 17%Elkin Rescue Squad: $15k → 17%Elkin Rescue Squad: $15k → 17%ELKIN RESCUE SQUAD: $15k → 17%ELKIN RESCUE SQUAD: $14k → 17%MOUNTAIN PARK RESCUE SQUAD: $15k → 17%MOUNTAIN PARK RESCUE SQUAD: $15k → 17%MOUNTAIN PARK RESCUE SQUAD: $15k → 17%MOUNTAIN PARK RESCUE SQUAD: $15k → 17%Mountain Park Rescue Squad: $12k → 17%Mountain Park Rescue Squad: $12k → 17%MOUNTAIN PARK RESCUE SQUAD: $12k → 17%Mountain Park Rescue Squad: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$909k · 12 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$909k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+25%

Still filing today

42%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TRI COUNTY CHRISTIAN CRISIS MINISTR
    7× · 2019–2025 · $206k · revenue +27%
  • EM
    ECHO MINISTRY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $149k · revenue +35%
  • MP
    MOUNTAIN PARK RESCUE SQUAD INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $106k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • EM
    ECHO MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • TC
    TRI COUNTY HEALTH RESO
    one grant, 2018 · $17k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $17k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRI COUNTY CHRISTIAN CRISIS MINISTR: $206,100 · OtherTRI COUNTY CHRISTIAN CRISIS MINISTRIndividual grant recipient: $119,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRI-COUNTY HEALTH RESOURCE: $72,000 · OtherTRI-COUNTY HEALTH RESOURCEYADKIN VALLEY SENIOR CENTER: $71,500 · OtherYADKIN VALLEY SENIOR CENTERTri-County Health Resource Center: $54,000 · OtherTri-County Health Resource CenterECHO MINISTRIES: $25,000 · Other+6 more: $87,500 · Other+6 moreECHO MINISTRY: $149,300 · ReligionECHO MINISTRYMOUNTAIN PARK RESCUE SQUAD INC: $105,500 · HealthMOUNTAIN PARK RES…CARENET COUNSELING OF WILKES INC: $41,400 · HealthCARENET COUNSELIN…CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SURRY INC: $42,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$635,100Religion$149,300Health$146,900Crime & Legal$42,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRI COUNTY CHRISTIAN CRISIS MINISTR: $206,100 over 7y, 21% of budgetECHO MINISTRY: $149,300 over 7y, 8.4% of budgetMOUNTAIN PARK RESCUE SQUAD INC: $105,500 over 8y, 16% of budgetCHILDREN'S CENTER OF SURRY INC: $42,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCARENET COUNSELING OF WILKES INC: $41,400 over 7y, 12% of budgetOLD HICKORY COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRI COUNTY CHRISTIAN CRISIS MINISTR ↗
  • Who funds ECHO MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN PARK RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CENTER OF SURRY INC ↗
  • Who funds CARENET COUNSELING OF WILKES INC ↗
  • Who funds OLD HICKORY COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The Winston-Salem FoundationNC15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winston-Salem Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yadkin Valley United Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yadkin Valley United Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yadkin Valley United’s filings →

    More from the funding graph