Skip to content

· Public charity

Yaazoru Inc

To provide financial and other assistance to educational institutions.

$6.5M
Granted FY2023
48
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$2.3M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Religion$6.5MHuman Services$376kPublic Benefit$106kArts & Culture$82kPhilanthropy$23k
02FY2023 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 48 grants below total $4,405,880, the rows itemized in this filing. The $6,535,166 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,129,286 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k7 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k29 grants · $621k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $885k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.9M
$21,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$169k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONG TIFERES YAKOV INC$2,298,389
CONGREGATION SHAREI TORAH$295,846
ANI LEDODI INC$259,200
SHEMESH ZTADUKAH$185,850
CONGREGATION CHADEI NEHORAE TAV$123,984
UTA MESIVTA OF KIRYAS JOEL$116,560
CONGREGATION TEFILA LEMOSHE$112,400
CONG REB MEIERL INC$86,410
TOVA UVRUCHA INC$73,633
CATV INC$73,000
CONGREGATION CHONEN VNOSEN$59,350
CONG MESIVTA$53,976
KIPAS ERINY$45,000
ASEI TOV$40,000
PAILE YOEDZ$37,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $306k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ANI LEDODI INC: $259k → 20%Ani Ledodi: $47k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

36%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 14 repeat orgs$4.6M to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
33

Total granted

$2.6M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+32%

Still filing today

14%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesReligionArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CONGREGATION SHAREI TORAH
    3× · 2021–2023 · $541k
  • SZ
    SHEMESH ZTADUKAH
    4× · 2020–2023 · $444k
  • KS
    KOLLEL SHAREI TZION LMETZYONIM
    2× · 2021–2022 · $440k

Funded once

  • KY
    KOLEL YETEV LEV DJERUSALEM
    one grant, 2022 · $316k
  • CT
    CONGREGATION TIFERES YAAKOV
    one grant, 2022 · $238k
  • VI
    VYAZREIM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $106k · revenue +32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chaverim Foundation Inc

To help the indigent and other charitable institutions.

Human Services
2
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
3
American Friends of Zichron Yosef R

To provide relief funds

International
4
Asif Inc

ASIF helps its donees by providing information and performing due diligence on charitable organizations in Israel on the donees' behalf.

—
5
Zichron Boruch Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Chasdei Yetev Lev Inc

Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.

—
7
Friends of Tzeirei Chabad in Israel Inc

To pursue a greater outreach of knowledge of the Jewish Torah and to further educate the less knowledgeable

Religion
8
Zichron Chaim Avraham Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Beis Yosef Chaim Inc

To provide financial assistance to religious and charitable organizations worldwide to help them continue their activities.

Philanthropy
10
Yeshivat Leluv of Jerusalem Inc

Charitable work to help people in need

—
11
Israel Chai Foundation Inc

Provided grants to domestic and foreign organizations for purposes for furthering religious outreach and religious education.

International
12
Yaazoru Chasdei Binyomin Inc

Provides financial assistance to low income individuals and thier families. Promotes Jewish religous practices and activities through thier various programs in the United States and Israel.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Zichron Chasdei Eliezer Inc; the most unlike its peers is Community Access Television Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONG TIFERES YAKOV INC: $2,298,389 · OtherCONG TIFERES YAKOV INCCONGREGATION SHAREI TORAH: $541,177 · OtherCONGREGATION SHAREI TORAHSHEMESH ZTADUKAH: $443,970 · OtherSHEMESH ZTADUKAHKOLLEL SHAREI TZION LMETZYONIM: $440,000 · OtherKOLLEL SHAREI TZION LMETZYONIMKOLEL YETEV LEV DJERUSALEM: $316,313 · OtherCONGREGATION TIFERES YAAKOV: $238,200 · Other+66 more: $2,214,306 · Other+66 moreAni Ledodi Inc: $305,700 · Human ServicesSHUMATI INC: $13,600 · Human ServicesVYAZREIM INC: $105,717 · Public BenefitCommunity Access Television Inc: $73,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BNAI LEVY FOUNDATION: $13,000 · PhilanthropyZICHRON CHASDEI ELIEZER INC: $12,500 · PhilanthropyICHAI FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyKEREN AVRUM YOSEF INC: $8,500 · PhilanthropyTALMUD TORAH BRESLOV INC: $29,800 · ReligionAYZER LALIYA INC: $7,200 · ReligionTHE BLOOMING GROVE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $30,500 · Community ImprovementKolel Shomre Hachomos of Jerusalem Inc: $23,000 · International
Other$6,492,355Human Services$319,300Public Benefit$105,717Arts & Culture$73,000Philanthropy$44,000Religion$37,000Community Improvement$30,500International$23,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAni Ledodi Inc: $305,700 over 2y, 14% of budgetVYAZREIM INC: $105,717 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCommunity Access Television Inc: $73,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetTHE BLOOMING GROVE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $30,500 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetTALMUD TORAH BRESLOV INC: $29,800 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetKolel Shomre Hachomos of Jerusalem Inc: $23,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHUMATI INC: $13,600 over 1y, 14% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BNAI LEVY FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZICHRON CHASDEI ELIEZER INC: $12,500 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetICHAI FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKEREN AVRUM YOSEF INC: $8,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetAYZER LALIYA INC: $7,200 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Ani Ledodi Inc ↗
  • Who funds VYAZREIM INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Access Television Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BLOOMING GROVE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TALMUD TORAH BRESLOV INC ↗
  • Who funds Kolel Shomre Hachomos of Jerusalem Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY82.9× affinity73 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Vyazreim Inc · American Friends of Bnai Levy Foundation · Chayim V Chesed · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · The Schwartz Charitable Foundation Inc · Zelig and Rifky Weiss Family Foundation Inc · Strulovich Family Foundation Trust · Donors Fund Inc · Community Health Aide Services Inc · Hf Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Yaazoru Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Yaazoru Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Yaazoru Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Yaazoru Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Yaazoru’s filings →

    More from the funding graph