Skip to content
Y T M Charitable Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Y T M Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$116k
Granted FY2025still arriving
36
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$1.1MEducation$119kHealth$27kInternational$15kArts & Culture$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kHuman Services$989Philanthropy$460Other$0
02FY2025 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k32 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $69k
$1,108
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS CHARITIES$25,389
BAIS YAAKOV ELEMENTARY OF ROCKLAND COUNTY$20,100
THE CHEDER$12,500
YESHIVA BETH DAVID$10,700
BAIS MIKROH$7,030
YESHIVA TORAS CHAIM$6,800
BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA$4,800
YESHIVA DVAR TORAH$4,200
CONGREGATION OHR SHRAGA DVERETSKY$3,600
YAD L'ACHIM$2,407
KOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM$2,366
YESHIVA SHAARE RACHAMIM$2,300
KUPAT HAIR$1,948
PEYLIM LEV LACHIM$1,674
BONEI OLAM$1,592
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%OORAH: $100 → 11%BONEI OLAM: $18k → 20%BONEI OLAM: $2k → 20%A-TIME: $101 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $250 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $180 → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP: $100 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
MD
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 39 repeat orgs$249k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
49

Total granted

$1.3M
$218k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+23%

Still filing today

28%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YD
    YESHIVAS D'VAR TORAH INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $42k · revenue +53%
  • BO
    Bonei Olam Inc
    4× · 2019–2025 · $20k · revenue +160%
  • MU
    MIKVAH USA INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $10k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • YT
    YESHIVA TORAS ARON INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $39k · revenue +34%
  • YS
    YESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
6
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
7
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
8
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
9
Zocher Chasdai Ovos

Jewish Observance of Shabbos, Chagim, Torah Learning

Religion
10
Ohr Yisrael Yeshiva Inc

Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.

Religion
11
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
12
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vaad Harabbanim L'inyanei Tzeduka Inc; the most unlike its peers is TorahAnytimeCom Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 103 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
20/34
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TORAH UMESORAH: $800,000 · OtherTORAH UMESORAHVARIOUS CHARITIES: $131,725 · OtherVARIOUS CHARITIESIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $60,100 · Other+68 more: $293,115 · Other+68 moreYESHIVA TORAS ARON INC: $38,979 · EducationYESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC: $10,000 · EducationMESIVTA NEZER HATORAH: $10,000 · Education+5 more: $3,364 · EducationYESHIVAS D'VAR TORAH INC: $42,133 · PhilanthropyTIFERET YERUSHALAYIM FOUNDATION: $1,850 · Philanthropy+2 more: $460 · PhilanthropyMIKVAH USA INC: $9,930 · ReligionLEV BEREL INC: $6,600 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $1,516 · ReligionYeshiva Gedolah of Elkins Park: $1,000 · Religion+8 more: $1,670 · ReligionBonei Olam Inc: $20,022 · Human Services+3 more: $301 · Human ServicesKOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM: $7,691 · InternationalEZER MIZION: $6,000 · InternationalCHAVEIRIM VOLUNTEER SERVICES INC: $3,600 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$1,384,940Education$62,343Philanthropy$44,443Religion$20,716Human Services$20,323International$13,691Public Safety & Disaster$3,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVAS D'VAR TORAH INC: $42,133 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS ARON INC: $38,979 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $20,022 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMESIVTA NEZER HATORAH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMIKVAH USA INC: $9,930 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $7,843 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetKOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM: $7,691 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLEV BEREL INC: $6,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEZER MIZION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHAVEIRIM VOLUNTEER SERVICES INC: $3,600 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHEICHAL HATORAH: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIFERET YERUSHALAYIM FOUNDATION: $1,850 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF KUPAT HA'IR: $1,516 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYeshiva Gedolah of Elkins Park: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATSKILLS HATZALAH INC: $660 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKOLLEL OHR MOSHE INC: $650 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetVAAD HARABBANIM L'INYANEI TZEDUKA INC: $473 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMENORAH FOUNDATION INC: $360 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMUDEI CHESED INC: $280 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAMCHAINU INC: $272 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV OF BOSTON INC: $244 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHR CHODOSH INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSERVICES FOR CHILDREN WITH HIDDEN INTELLIGENCE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOORAH INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWE LOVE TO HELP: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTZOFNAS YOSHER INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $43 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAZAK: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Zionist Movement Inc: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVAS D'VAR TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA TORAS ARON INC ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA SHAGAS ARYEH INC ↗
  • Who funds MESIVTA NEZER HATORAH ↗
  • Who funds MIKVAH USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PEYLIM LEV LACHIM ↗
  • Who funds KOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM ↗
  • Who funds LEV BEREL INC ↗
  • Who funds EZER MIZION ↗
  • Who funds CHAVEIRIM VOLUNTEER SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJewish Communal FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…National Society for …The Jimmy and Berta K…Regina Goldwasser Fou…Eisenberg Family Foun…The Fishoff Family Fo…The Lexicon Foundatio…Marbeh Shalom Foundat…Donors Fund IncJewish Community Foun…
The Ojc FundNY38.9× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · The Fishoff Family Foundation · The Lexicon Foundation Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Donors Fund Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Y T M Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Y T M Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Yeshiva Shagas Aryeh Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Bais Yaakov of Boston Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Mesivta Nezer Hatorah: 7% of income from government
  • Heichal Hatorah: 1% of income from government
  • Oorah Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Y T M Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Y T M Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 103 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Y T M’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home