Skip to content

· Private foundation

Wright to Dream Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$853k
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$1.5MHealth$664kInternational$560kReligion$449kRecreation & Sports$325kYouth Development$170kPhilanthropy$104kFood & Nutrition$52kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $117k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $447k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$2,200
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Duke University$250,000
Church of Jesus Christ of LDS$197,175
Friends of the Millard Childrens Ju$150,000
Utah Valley University Foundation$100,000
Juab High School$39,000
Individual grant recipient$21,500
Mission of Grace$20,000
TD Charity Foundation$16,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
AIM Basketball LLC$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,649
Utah State Fair$5,813
Give Oils Foundation$5,125
Hi 5 Live LLC$2,673
Individual grant recipient$2,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 73% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LIVE YOUR DREAM: $5k → 22%LIVE TO GIVE INC: $100k → 14%Mission of Grace: $20k → 11%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $250k → 11%DUKE UNIVERSITY: $250k → 8%University of Utah: $4k → 8%doTERRA Healing Hands: $500k → 8%SPORTSMEN FOR FISH & WILDLIFE: $5k → 9%Utah NENA: $10k → 10%Give Oils Foundation: $5k → 15%TD Charity Foundation: $16k → 7%Duke University: $250k → 11%HOPE INITIATIVE: $245k → 8%CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS: $252k → 8%DOTERRA HEALING HANDS FOUNDATION: $310k → 8%Snow College: $300k → 15%Duke University: $250k → 11%Friends of the Millard Childrens Ju: $150k → 8%Church of Jesus Christ of LDS: $197k → 8%Dahlia's Hope: $22k → 8%MICHELLE PETERSON: $100k → 8%MIRACLE OF AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION: $50k → 8%Hi 5 Live LLC: $3k → 8%JUAB HIGH SCHOOL: $51k → 8%Juab High School: $39k → 8%Utah State Fair: $6k → 8%AIM Basketball LLC: $10k → 8%JUAB HIGH SCHOOL: $35k → 8%UVU FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%UGANDA ORGPHANAGE: $24k → 8%UVU Foundation: $100k → 8%Juab County School District: $16k → 8%Utah Valley University Foundation: $100k → 8%Juab Jr Livestock: $14k → 8%Schwab Funeral Services: $13k → 8%Juab County School District: $12k → 8%Linda Greenhaulgh: $10k → 8%JR Warner: $10k → 8%Juab Jr Livestock: $9k → 8%UTE STAMPEDE RODEO: $5k → 8%HOUSTON HAMPTON: $5k → 8%Jennifer Frank: $5k → 8%Juab Volleyball: $5k → 8%Nephi City Corporation: $5k → 8%American Legion: $3k → 8%Kayner Kay: $2k → 8%Anderson Funeral Home: $2k → 8%KAUNER KAY: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MT
OH
PA
UT
NC
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Wright to Dream Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 77% of the giving stays in UT; by stated purpose, 63%.

Wright to Dream Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 9 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +1% since the first grant, against -34% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
28

Total granted

$1.1M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
-34%

Still filing today

22%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $553k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationInternationalAnimalsPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2021–2024 · $750k · revenue +1%
  • UF
    UVU Foundation
    2× · 2021–2022 · $200k
  • JH
    JUAB HIGH SCHOOL
    3× · 2022–2024 · $125k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $500k
  • DH
    doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $310k · revenue -34%
  • SC
    Snow College
    one grant, 2021 · $300k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Us Farming and Ranching Foundation

MISSION: bring all of American agriculture together, with farmers and ranchers at the center, to collectively identify and tackle critical, long-term issues. We collaborate, communicate, educate, advocate and utilize science to advance the…

Food & Nutrition
2
Utah Geological Foundation
—
3
Us Farmers and Ranchers Alliance

MISSION: bring all of American agriculture together, with farmers and ranchers at the center, to collectively identify and tackle critical, long-term issues. We collaborate, communicate, educate, advocate and utilize science to advance the…

Community Improvement
4
The Utah Tech University Foundation

To promote and support Utah Tech University previously Dixie State University and its various scientific educational and other activities programs and services.

Education
5
Utah Motorsports Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Wyoming State Fair Foundation

To ensure that the Wyoming State Fair serves as a vibrant celebration of our states agriculture, youth, education, heritage, and industry, while evolving to meet the needs of future generations. WSFF is the fundraising arm of the WSF,…

Recreation & Sports
7
National Farmers Union Foundation

The national farmers union foundation's (nfuf) mission is to empower people to educate our youth, neighbors, media and policymakers on the social, economic and cooperative contributions of family agriculture.

Food & Nutrition
8
Hawaii Farmers Union Foundation

Hawaii Farmers Union Foundation believes in sustainable agriculture and local food systems that promote a healthy environment and strong communities. Its mission is to build a supportive regenerative agricultural system where farmers can…

Education
9
Sci Utah Foundation

To ensure the future of wildlife through conservation, education and hunting.

Animals
10
Montana Farmers Union Foundation

None

Food & Nutrition
11
University of Utah Foundation

Provide support to the University of Utah Growth Capital Partners Foundation in Charitable, Educational and Scientific purposes.

Philanthropy
12
Farmers Educational & Cooperative Union of America Montana

Inform, educate & represent member interests

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah State Fair Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Mission of Grace Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSnow College: $300,000 · OtherSnow CollegeTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS: $251,757 · OtherTHE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTSDUKE UNIVERSITY: $250,000 · OtherDUKE UNIVERSITYHOPE INITIATIVE: $245,000 · OtherHOPE INITIATIVEUVU Foundation: $200,000 · OtherUVU FoundationChurch of Jesus Christ of LDS: $197,175 · OtherChurch of Jesus Christ of LDSFriends of the Millard Childrens Ju: $150,000 · OtherFriends of the Millard Childrens JuJUAB HIGH SCHOOL: $125,041 · OtherLIVE TO GIVE INC: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · Other+43 more: $245,338 · Other+43 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY: $750,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY F…doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation: $310,450 · InternationaldoTERRA H…MIRACLE OF AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyMISSION OF GRACE INC: $20,000 · ReligionSPORTSMEN FOR FISH & WILDLIFE INC: $6,975 · AnimalsUtah State Fair Corporation: $5,813 · Recreation & SportsUTAH STATE JR LIVESTOCK SHOW: $891 · Youth Development
Other$2,664,311Education$850,000International$310,450Philanthropy$50,000Religion$20,000Animals$6,975Recreation & Sports$5,813Youth Development$891

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $750,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetdoTERRA Healing Hands Foundation: $310,450 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetUTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMIRACLE OF AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetMISSION OF GRACE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSPORTSMEN FOR FISH & WILDLIFE INC: $6,975 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUtah State Fair Corporation: $5,813 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUTAH STATE JR LIVESTOCK SHOW: $891 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds doTERRA Healing Hands Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE OF AGRICULTURE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MISSION OF GRACE INC ↗
  • Who funds SPORTSMEN FOR FISH & WILDLIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds Utah State Fair Corporation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Wright to Dream Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Wright to Dream Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Wright to Dream’s filings →

    More from the funding graph