Skip to content

· Public charity

Workforce Alliance of South Central Kansas Inc

The mission of the workforce alliance of south central kansas is to develop and lead a flexible, integrated workforce system that identifies and responds to the current and future needs of our region and state.

$308k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$168k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Employment$951kEducation$106kHealth$38kPublic Benefit$35k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $242k
$73,807
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY$167,876
ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC$73,807
LEAD FOR AMERICA$35,000
COWLEY COLLEGE$30,326
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $372k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $156k → 12%KANSAS LOCAL AREA I WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD INC: $10k → 13%EMPOWER EVERGREEN: $9k → 16%ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $122k → 12%KANSAS LOCAL AREA I WORKFORCE INVESTMENT BOARD INC: $1k → 13%ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $74k → 12%KANSAS LOCAL AREA I WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $268 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 8 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$1.0M
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
0%

Still filing today

25%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
Human ServicesEmploymentHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EY
    ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $352k · revenue -40%
  • KA
    KANSAS ATHLETICS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $305k
  • CC
    COWLEY COLLEGE
    4× · 2021–2024 · $106k

Funded once

  • CP
    CEREBRAL PALSY RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF KANSAS INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $38k · revenue 0%
  • XO
    XLT OVENS
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
  • EE
    EMPOWER EVERGREEN INC
    one grant, 2023 · $9k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Goodwill Industries of Central Oklahoma Inc

We help people overcome challenges to employment.

Employment
2
Goodwill Industries of North Central Wisconsin Inc

Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.

Human Services
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
Goodwill Industries of Greater New York & Northern New Jersey Inc

Goodwill nynj empowers people with disabilities and other barriers to employment to gain independence through the power of work. goodwill nynj provided services to more than 11,087 adults in fiscal year 2025 through all programs.

Employment
5
Full Employment Council Inc

The full employment council is a business-led, private, nonprofit corporation whose mission is to obtain public and private sector employment for the unemployed and underemployed residents of the greater kansas city area.

Crime & Legal
6
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
7
Goodwill Industries of Metropolitan Chicago Inc

Goodwill industries of metropolitan chicago, inc. ("goodwill-chicago") is a nonstock, not-for-profit illinois corporation, whose sole member is goodwill industries of southeastern wisconsin, inc. ("goodwill"), a wisconsin nonstock,…

Human Services
8
Wichita Regional Chamber of Commerce Inc

To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.

—
9
Chamber of Commerce of Greater Kansas City

Leading the way to the best kc region by convening innovative leaders, collaborating with like-minded organizations, advocating for positive change, and helping small businesses grow.

—
10
Goodwill Industries of the Chesapeake Inc

Goodwill industries of the chesapeake, inc. prepares people to secure and retain employment and build successful, independent lives.

—
11
Goodwill Industries of Southeastern Michigan Inc

Goodwill provides exceptional opportunities for people facing employment barriers.

—
12
Goodwill Industries Inc

Goodwill changes lives and strengthens communities through education, training and work. goodwill strives to increase self sufficiency of its participants through vocational evaluation, training and offering employment opportunities to…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Wichita Partnership Inc; the most unlike its peers is Empower Evergreen Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KANSAS ATHLETICS INC: $305,011 · OtherKANSAS ATHLETICS INCCOWLEY COLLEGE: $106,179 · OtherCOWLEY COLLEGEWSU Tech: $92,532 · OtherWSU TechCOX MACHINE INC: $90,500 · OtherCOX MACHINE INCMAHANEY GROUP INC: $35,500 · OtherWOLFE ELECTRIC: $35,500 · Other+1 more: $12,500 · OtherECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $351,730 · Human ServicesECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC+2 more: $20,679 · Human Services+2 moreCEREBRAL PALSY RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF KANSAS INC: $38,254 · HealthNATIONAL LEAD FOR AMERICA INC: $35,000 · Public BenefitGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF KANSAS INC: $6,600 · Employment
Other$677,722Human Services$372,409Health$38,254Public Benefit$35,000Employment$6,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC: $351,730 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCEREBRAL PALSY RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF KANSAS INC: $38,254 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL LEAD FOR AMERICA INC: $35,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKANSAS LOCAL AREA I WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC: $11,879 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEMPOWER EVERGREEN INC: $8,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF KANSAS INC: $6,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds CEREBRAL PALSY RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF KANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LEAD FOR AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS LOCAL AREA I WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWER EVERGREEN INC ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF KANSAS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the Plains IncKS13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the Plains Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Workforce Alliance of South Central Kansas Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Workforce Alliance of South Central Kansas Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Eckerd Youth Alternatives Inc: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $286k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Workforce Alliance of South Central Kansas’ filings →

More from the funding graph