Skip to content

· Private foundation

Woods Charitable Fund Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.3M
Granted FY2023
40
Grants FY2023
—
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Crime & Legal$728kPublic Benefit$365kHuman Services$362kEducation$295kArts & Culture$210kFood & Nutrition$208kYouth Development$123kCivil Rights$105kOther$0
02FY2023 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 40 grants below total $1,107,100, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,322,100 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $215,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $588k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $512k
$20,000
Median grant
—
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Food Bank of Lincoln, Inc.$150,000
Legal Aid of Nebraska$110,000
Lincoln Literacy Council (aka LLC)$75,000
Lincoln Littles (Fiscal Sponsor Lincoln Community Foundation, Inc.)$61,500
El Centro de Las Americas$60,000
Asian Community and Cultural Center$55,000
Center for Legal Immigration Assistance (aka CLIA)$40,000
City of Lincoln-Lincoln Police Department$35,000
Big Brothers Big Sisters Lincoln (Staff support for community-based mentoring)$30,000
HUB Central Access Point for Young Adults$30,000
St. Monica's Home (aka St. Monica's)$30,000
HopeSpoke$30,000
Mourning Hope (aka Mourning Hope Grief Center)$25,000
Lincoln YWCA (aka YWCA Lincoln)$25,000
Indian Center, Inc.$25,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 13 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
27

Total granted

$1.2M
$876k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $562k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FV
    Family Violence Council
    2× · 2022–2023 · $315k
  • LA
    Legal Aid of Nebraska
    2× · 2022–2023 · $240k
  • FB
    Food Bank of Lincoln, Inc.
    2× · 2022–2023 · $163k

Funded once

  • CN
    Civic Nebraska (Collective Impact Lincoln)
    one grant, 2022 · $300k
  • LL
    Lincoln Literacy Council (aka LLC) (Breakthrough 3.0 Bridgeway to A Better Life)
    one grant, 2022 · $135k
  • FS
    Fresh Start, Inc.
    one grant, 2022 · $45k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field
03the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2022–2023.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2022 to 2023, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Family Violence Council: $315,000 · OtherFamily Violence CouncilCivic Nebraska (Collective Impact Lincoln): $300,000 · OtherCivic Nebraska (Collective Impact Lincoln)Legal Aid of Nebraska: $240,000 · OtherLegal Aid of NebraskaFood Bank of Lincoln, Inc.: $162,500 · OtherFood Bank of Lincoln, Inc.Lincoln Literacy Council (aka LLC) (Breakthrough 3.0 Bridgeway to A Better Life): $135,000 · OtherCenter for Legal Immigration Assistance (aka CLIA): $120,000 · Other+57 more: $1,350,100 · Other+57 more
Other$2,622,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Woods Charitable Fund Inc?

Find your warmest path to Woods Charitable Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $1.6M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Woods’ filings →

More from the funding graph