Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Georgia · Public charity

Women's Public Leadership Network Inc

To provide women with the knowledge and resources to make seeking public office and engaging in the political process more accessible.

$446k
Granted FY2020
10
Itemized grants FY2020
10
Organizations funded FY2020
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2020
$429k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2020
$60,000
Largest grant, FY2020
$63,000
States reached, FY2020
9
Total assets, FY2020
$1.4M

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
MA
CA
CO
VA
NM
LA
GA
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Virginia Conservative Women's Coalition$63,0001n/a
Colorado Women's Alliance Foundation$60,0001n/a
The University of Texas Foundation Inc$60,00010%
Rise New Mexico Inc$60,0001n/a
California Womens Leadership Assoc$60,0001n/a
Pocketbook Project Inc$60,0001n/a
Colorado Womens Alliance$16,500118%
She Holds the Key Inc$16,5001n/a
Louisiana Women Lead$16,500153%
Voteher Inc$16,5001n/a

Compare Women's Public Leadership Network Inc with peer funders

About Women's Public Leadership Network Inc

How much does Women's Public Leadership Network Inc give?
Women's Public Leadership Network Inc reported 10 itemized grants totaling $429,000, out of $445,500 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2020 IRS filing.
What does Women's Public Leadership Network Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2020, its largest causes are Public Benefit (100%).
Who are Women's Public Leadership Network Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2020: Virginia Conservative Women's Coalition ($63k), Colorado Women's Alliance Foundation ($60k), The University of Texas Foundation Inc ($60k).
Where is Women's Public Leadership Network Inc based?
Women's Public Leadership Network Inc is based in GA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Women's Public Leadership Network’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home