Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Wisys Technology Foundation Inc

Supporting universities of wisconsin faculty, staff, students, and alumni to innovate for impact.

$511k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$135k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Science & Tech$1.1MEducation$367kArts & Culture$62kCommunity Improvement$55kYouth Development$9kEnvironment$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 12 grants below total $479,276 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $511,350 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $32,074 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $216k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $263k
$27,079
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON$134,728
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION$76,540
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-PLATTEVILLE$51,818
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-LA CROSSE$44,401
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-OSHKOSH$37,677
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-RIVER FALLS$27,079
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-PARKSIDE$24,308
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-WHITEWATER$23,687
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STOUT$21,920
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MILWAUKEE RESEARCH FOUNDATION$16,683
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT$10,340
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-GREEN BAY$10,095
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 61% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-RIVER FALLS: $27k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-PARKSIDE: $24k → 10%UW-GREEN BAY: $118k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT: $10k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-WHITEWATER: $24k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON: $135k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STOUT: $22k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-OSHKOSH: $38k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION: $77k → 12%UW-LA CROSSE: $46k → 12%UW-PLATTEVILLE: $116k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MILWAUKEE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $17k → 17%UW-RIVER FALLS: $18k → 9%UW-GREEN BAY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES: $49k → 10%UW-WHITEWATER: $11k → 10%UW-MADISON: $24k → 10%UW-STOUT: $13k → 11%UW-OSHKOSH: $23k → 11%UW-EAU CLAIRE: $75k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-LA CROSSE: $44k → 12%UW-PLATTEVILLE: $70k → 13%UW-MILWAUKEE: $17k → 17%UW-RIVER FALLS: $12k → 9%UW-GREEN BAY: $44k → 10%UW-WHITEWATER: $10k → 10%WI TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL: $20k → 10%UW-STOUT: $13k → 11%UW-OSHKOSH: $16k → 11%UW-EAU CLAIRE: $45k → 12%UW-LA CROSSE DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY AND BIOCHEMISTRY: $35k → 12%UW-PLATTEVILLE: $68k → 13%UW-RIVER FALLS BIOLOGY DEPARTMENT: $9k → 9%UW-GREEN BAY: $40k → 10%UW-STOUT: $9k → 11%UW-OSHKOSH: $15k → 11%UW-LA CROSSE: $24k → 12%UW-PLATTEVILLE: $68k → 13%UW-GREEN BAY: $15k → 10%UW-OSHKOSH: $10k → 11%UW-LA CROSSE DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY AND BIOCHEMISTRY: $18k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-PLATTEVILLE: $52k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-GREEN BAY: $10k → 10%UW-LA CROSSE: $9k → 12%UW-PLATTEVILLE: $19k → 13%UW-GREEN BAY DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCE: $9k → 10%UW-PLATTEVILLE DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY: $10k → 13%UW-GREEN BAY: $8k → 10%UW-PLATTEVILLE: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
04the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 6 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
0/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN — $1,360,939 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSINUniversity of Wisconsin Madison — $159,144 · OtherUniversity of Wisconsin MadisonUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC — $76,540 · EducationTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC — $16,683 · EducationWISCONSIN TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL INC — $19,750 · Community ImprovementUWM RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $16,683 · Community Improvement
Other$1,520,083Education$93,223Community Improvement$36,433

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC — $76,540 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWISCONSIN TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL INC — $19,750 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetUWM RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $16,683 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC — $16,683 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Wisys Technology Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph