Skip to content
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

Wisconsin · Public charity

Wisconsin Conservation Voters Inc

To engage voters to protect wisconsin's environment.

$324k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
7
Grants FY2024
1
Organizations funded FY2020
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$120,000
States reached, FY2024
1
Total assets, FY2024
$1.6M
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Environment$260kHealth$50kCommunity Improvement$25kPublic Benefit$25k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2020 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Wisconsin Opportunity Coalition Inc$145,00016%
Wisconsin Conservation Voters Independent Expenditures$115,0002n/a
Planned Parenthood Advocates of Wisconsin Inc$50,00017%
Center for Community Stewardship$25,00011%
Healthy Climate Wisconsin Inc$15,00013%
350 Wisconsin Inc$10,00014%

Compare Wisconsin Conservation Voters Inc with peer funders

About Wisconsin Conservation Voters Inc

How much does Wisconsin Conservation Voters Inc give?
Wisconsin Conservation Voters Inc reported 7 grants totaling $324,274 in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Wisconsin Conservation Voters Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2020 to FY2024, its largest causes are Environment (72%), Health (14%), Community Improvement (7%).
Who are Wisconsin Conservation Voters Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2020 to FY2024: Wisconsin Opportunity Coalition Inc ($145k), Wisconsin Conservation Voters Independent Expenditures ($115k), Planned Parenthood Advocates of Wisconsin Inc ($50k).
Where is Wisconsin Conservation Voters Inc based?
Wisconsin Conservation Voters Inc is based in WI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 6 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Wisconsin Conservation Voters’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home