Skip to content

· Private foundation

Williams Family Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2026still arriving
6
Grants FY2026still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$124kHealth$18kEducation$7kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2026 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k4 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$55k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOSEPH'S CHURCH$10,000
CENTRAL CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF NEW$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FRENCH AND PICKERING TRUST$1,000
BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,000
PROJECT HEALING WATERS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EPISCOPAL RELIF & DEVELOPMENT: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
NY
MA
PA
CO
VA
MD
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$110k · 6 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
13

Total granted

$110k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+24%

Still filing today

33%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH'S CHURCH
    4× · 2023–2026 · $30k
  • SD
    ST DAVIDS CHURCH
    2× · 2024–2025 · $27k
  • CC
    CENTRAL CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF NEW SALEM
    2× · 2023–2024 · $23k

Funded once

  • NS
    NEW SALME CENTRAL CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $32k
  • CC
    Care Central VNA & Hospice Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +22%
  • EA
    Episcopal Academy
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
2
Emerson College

See schedule o.emerson college's mission is to educate and elevate extraordinary artists, communicators, scholars, and professionals for the betterment of humanity. we pursue this mission through world-class teaching, practice,…

Education
3
Breck School

We create confident learners who lead lives of intellectual curiosity, self-knowledge, and social responsibility.

Education
4
Drake University

See schedule o.drake's mission is to provide an exceptional learning environment that prepares students for meaningful personal lives, professional accomplishments, and responsible global citizenship. the drake experience is distinguished…

Education
5
Centre College

Centre college is a small, independent, and selective educational community dedicated to study in the liberal arts as a means to develop the intellectual, personal, and moral potential of its students. centre nurtures in its students the…

Education
6
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
7
New England College

New England College emphasizes experiential learning as an essential component in the development of an enduring academic community. Building upon a strong liberal arts foundation, we challenge our students to reach their full potential…

Education
8
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
9
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
10
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
11
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
12
America's Essential Hospitals

America's essential hospitals champions excellence in health care for all, regardless of social or economic circumstance, and advances the work of hospitals and health systems committed to ensuring access to care and optimal health for…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc; the most unlike its peers is Casting for Recovery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW SALME CENTRAL CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $32,000 · OtherNEW SALME CENTRAL CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHST JOSEPH'S CHURCH: $30,000 · OtherST JOSEPH'S CHURCHST DAVIDS CHURCH: $27,000 · OtherST DAVIDS CHURCHCENTRAL CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF NEW SALEM: $23,000 · OtherCENTRAL CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF NEW SALEMST JOSEPHS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $17,000 · OtherST JOSEPHS EPISCOPAL CHURCHCENTRAL CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF NEW: $10,000 · OtherCENTRAL CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF NEW+7 more: $12,000 · Other+7 moreCASTING FOR RECOVERY: $9,000 · HealthCASTING FOR…Care Central VNA & Hospice Inc: $5,000 · HealthCare Centra…PROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC: $4,000 · HealthPROJECT HEA…THE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,000 · HealthEpiscopal Academy: $5,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationALLEN-CHASE FOUNDATION DBA EAGLEBROOK SCHOOL: $500 · EducationEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $5,000 · Human ServicesSHEA THEATER ARTS CENTER INC: $500 · Arts & CultureEGGTOOTH PRODUCTIONS INC: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$151,000Health$19,000Education$6,500Human Services$5,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCASTING FOR RECOVERY: $9,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCare Central VNA & Hospice Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEpiscopal Academy: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLEN-CHASE FOUNDATION DBA EAGLEBROOK SCHOOL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHEA THEATER ARTS CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEGGTOOTH PRODUCTIONS INC: $500 over 1y, 2.1% of budget1794 MEETINGHOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASTING FOR RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds Care Central VNA & Hospice Inc ↗
  • Who funds Episcopal Academy ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ALLEN-CHASE FOUNDATION DBA EAGLEBROOK SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SHEA THEATER ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds EGGTOOTH PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds 1794 MEETINGHOUSE INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Williams Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Williams Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Care Central Vna & Hospice Inc: 8% of income from government
  • 1794 Meetinghouse Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Eggtooth Productions Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Shea Theater Arts Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Williams Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph