Skip to content
William S Miller Charitable Trust B at a glance

· Private foundation

William S Miller Charitable Trust B

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$326k
Granted FY2026still arriving
7
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$98k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Religion$1.5MEducation$1.1MInternational$212k
02FY2026 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $228k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $98k
$32,619
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS$97,858
MARYLAND PROVINCE OF JESUITS$48,929
CENTRALSOUTHERN PROVINCE SOC OF JESUS$48,929
ST MARY'S COLLEGE$32,619
ST JOSEPH'S COLLEGE$32,619
WABASH COLLEGE$32,619
GEORGETOWN PREPARATORY SCHOOL$32,619
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%US CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN PROVINCE: $50k → 21%ST JOSEPH'S COLLEGE: $33k → 9%WABASH COLLEGE: $33k → 11%SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS: $100k → 13%GEORGETOWN PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $33k → 8%MARYLAND PROVINCE JESUIT: $50k → 19%CENTRALSOUTHERN PROVINCE SOC OF JESUS: $49k → 21%ST JOSEPH'S COLLEGE: $33k → 9%WABASH COLLEGE: $33k → 11%SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS: $98k → 13%GEORGETOWN PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $33k → 8%MARYLAND PROVINCE OF JESUITS: $49k → 19%CENTRALSOUTHERN PROVINCE SOC OF JESUS: $44k → 21%ST JOSEPH'S COLLEGE: $29k → 9%WABASH COLLEGE: $29k → 11%SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS: $88k → 13%GEORGETOWN PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $29k → 8%MARYLAND PROVINCE JESUIT: $44k → 19%CENTRALSOUTHERN PROVINCE SOC OF JESUS: $44k → 21%ST JOSEPH'S COLLEGE: $29k → 9%WABASH COLLEGE: $29k → 11%SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS: $87k → 13%GEORGETOWN PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $29k → 8%MARYLAND PROVINCE OF JESUITS: $44k → 19%US CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN PROVINCE: $43k → 21%ST JOSEPH'S COLLEGE: $28k → 9%WABASH COLLEGE: $28k → 11%SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS: $85k → 13%MARYLAND PROVINCE JESUIT: $43k → 19%US CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN PROVINCE: $41k → 21%SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS: $83k → 13%MARYLAND PROVINCE JESUIT: $41k → 19%US CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN PROVINCE: $39k → 21%SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS: $78k → 13%MARYLAND PROVINCE JESUIT: $39k → 19%US CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN PROVINCE: $39k → 21%SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS: $78k → 13%MARYLAND PROVINCE JESUIT: $39k → 19%JESUITS OF THE MISSOURI PROVINCE: $35k → 21%SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS: $69k → 13%MARYLAND PROVINCE JESUIT: $35k → 19%JESUITS OF THE MISSOURI PROVINCE: $34k → 21%SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS: $68k → 13%MARYLAND PROVINCE JESUIT: $34k → 19%ST MARY'S COLLEGE: $33k → 13%ST MARY'S COLLEGE: $33k → 13%ST MARY'S COLLEGE: $29k → 13%ST MARY'S COLLEGE: $29k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.8M · 10 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
0

Total granted

$2.8M
$0

Still filing today

20%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS
    10× · 2017–2026 · $835k
  • MP
    MARYLAND PROVINCE JESUIT
    8× · 2017–2024 · $325k
  • GP
    GEORGETOWN PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $278k

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    04the grantee network

    2 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 2 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    2/2
    Grantees still filing
    1/2
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    SISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSS: $835,010 · OtherSISTERS OF THE HOLY CROSSMARYLAND PROVINCE JESUIT: $324,944 · OtherMARYLAND PROVINCE JESUITGEORGETOWN PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $278,337 · OtherGEORGETOWN PREPARATORY SCHOOL INCST MARY'S COLLEGE: $278,337 · OtherST MARY'S COLLEGEUS CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN PROVINCE: $212,110 · OtherUS CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN PROVINCECENTRALSOUTHERN PROVINCE SOC OF JESUS: $136,735 · OtherCENTRALSOUTHERN PROVINCE SOC OF JESUSMARYLAND PROVINCE OF JESUITS: $92,560 · Other+1 more: $68,659 · OtherSAINT JOSEPH'S COLLEGE: $278,337 · EducationSAINT JOSEPH'S COLLEGEWabash College: $278,337 · EducationWabash College
    Other$2,226,692Education$556,674

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAINT JOSEPH'S COLLEGE: $278,337 over 10y, 0.9% of budgetWabash College: $278,337 over 10y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds SAINT JOSEPH'S COLLEGE ↗
    • Who funds Wabash College ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization William S Miller Charitable Trust B funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William S Miller Charitable Trust B. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on William S Miller Charitable Trust B’s filings →

      More from the funding graph

      The unnamed billions
      grants reported with no recipient in the public record
      The regranting layer
      51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
      The DAF merry-go-round
      $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
      The endowment market
      who holds foundation money, and what just moved
      The camps
      funders cluster by geography, not ideology
      By state
      where grant money is based, and what stays home