Skip to content

· Private foundation

William H Andreson Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$157kEducation$124kYouth Development$100kHealth$88kPublic Benefit$77kFood & Nutrition$66kCommunity Improvement$65kArts & Culture$52kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SACRED HEART CATHOLIC CHURCH$15,000
PLAINVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$10,000
CITY OF STOCKTON - EMS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
PLAINVILLE FOOD PANTRY$6,000
STOCKTON FOOD PANTRY$6,000
ROOKS COUNTY GOLF COURSE$6,000
UNDER HIS WINGS$5,859
ROOKS COUNTY HEALTH AUXILIARY$5,000
PLAINVILLE FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH$5,000
CODELL CHURCH$5,000
PLAINVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC$5,000
MAIN STREET CHRISTIAN CHURCH$5,000
PLAINVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
USD 271$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%CITY OF STOCKTON: $28k → 11%CITY OF STOCKTON: $13k → 11%VFW POST 8873: $13k → 11%STOCKTON FIRE DEPT: $13k → 11%USD 271: $10k → 11%ROOKS COUNTY EMS: $10k → 11%USD 271: $10k → 11%USD 271: $10k → 11%CITY OF STOCKTON - EMS: $10k → 11%USD 271: $10k → 11%STOCKTON FIRE DEPT: $10k → 11%ROOKS COUNTY EMS: $10k → 11%DSNWK-KIDLINE: $10k → 11%USD 271: $9k → 11%NOVA THEATER: $8k → 11%STOCKTON UMC: $8k → 11%USD 271: $8k → 11%CITY OF STOCKTON: $8k → 11%STOCKTON FOOD PANTRY: $7k → 11%STOCKTON UMC: $7k → 11%ROOKS COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES: $20k → 11%ROOKS COUNTY SENIOR SERVICES: $20k → 11%ROOKS COUNTY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%SACRED HEART CATHOLIC CHURCH: $15k → 11%CITY OF PLAINVILLE: $14k → 11%PLAINVILLE HOUSING AUTHORITY: $13k → 11%PLAINVILLE AMBASSADOR CLUB: $12k → 11%PLAINVILLE AMBASSADOR CLUB: $11k → 11%UNDER HIS WINGS: $10k → 11%UNDER HIS WINGS: $10k → 11%UNDER HIS WINGS: $10k → 11%ROOKS COUNTY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%UNDER HIS WINGS: $10k → 11%UNDER HIS WINGS: $10k → 11%PLAINVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $10k → 11%SACRED HEART SCHOOL: $10k → 11%UNDER HIS WINGS: $10k → 11%USD 270: $10k → 11%UNDER HIS WINGS: $10k → 11%PLAINVILLE FIRE: $10k → 11%ROOKS COUNTY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%PLAINVILLE AMBASSADOR CLUB: $9k → 11%ROOKS COUNTY HEALTH AUXILIARY: $8k → 11%PLAINVILLE FOOD PANTRY: $8k → 11%PLAINVILLE AMBASSADOR CLUB: $8k → 11%PLAINVILLE AMBASSADOR CLUB: $7k → 11%PLAINVILLE HIGH SCHOOL: $7k → 11%UNDER HIS WINGS: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$836k · 33 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
20

Total granted

$836k
$78k

Still filing today

6%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UH
    UNDER HIS WINGS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $83k
  • PA
    PLAINVILLE AMBASSADOR CLUB
    8× · 2017–2024 · $64k
  • U2
    USD 271
    7× · 2019–2025 · $62k

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF PLAINVILLE
    one grant, 2023 · $14k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNDER HIS WINGS: $82,859 · OtherUNDER HIS WINGSPLAINVILLE AMBASSADOR CLUB: $64,200 · OtherPLAINVILLE AMBASSADOR CLUBUSD 271: $61,740 · OtherUSD 271CITY OF STOCKTON: $53,500 · OtherCITY OF STOCKTONPLAINVILLE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $41,000 · OtherPLAINVILLE FOOD PANTRY: $34,000 · OtherNOVA THEATER: $33,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $32,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $32,200 · OtherSTOCKTON FOOD PANTRY INC: $32,073 · OtherPLAINVILLE FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $32,000 · OtherSACRED HEART CATHOLIC CHURCH: $32,000 · Other+43 more: $325,878 · Other+43 moreROOKS COUNTY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $35,062 · PhilanthropyPLAINVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $11,150 · PhilanthropyRooks County Senior Services Inc: $40,000 · Health
Other$857,800Philanthropy$46,212Health$40,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRooks County Senior Services Inc: $40,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetROOKS COUNTY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $35,062 over 3y, 11% of budgetPLAINVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $11,150 over 3y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Rooks County Senior Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROOKS COUNTY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PLAINVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Greater Salina Community FoundationKS15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Salina Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization William H Andreson Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from William H Andreson Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to William H Andreson Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to William H Andreson Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on William H Andreson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph